Reynolds: “Come Out of the White House with Your Hands Up!”
Kevin Barrett, 07.05.2006 13:06
Ex-Bush Official Busts 9/11 Perps at U.W. Historical Society
Madison, WI
Saturday, May 6, 2006
An enthusiastic standing-room-only crowd packed the Wisconsin Historical Society auditorium Saturday to hear ex-Bush Administration insider Morgan Reynolds prosecute top administration and military officials for the 9/11 inside job.
Reynolds to Cheney: "You're BUSTED!"
Reynolds indicted Richard Cheney, George W. Bush, former Joint Chiefs Chairman Richard Meyers, confessed WTC demolisher and insurance-fraudster Larry Silverstein, and others for mass murder, conspiracy, and other charges including high treason. The enthusiastic response from the overflow crowd was a de facto vote for conviction on all counts.
The former Director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis, showed that the defendants conspired to create a false cover story of suicide hijackings in order to “blow the World Trade Center to kingdom come” with explosives—a shock-and-awe psy-op designed to coerce the American people into supporting a pre-planned “long war” in the Middle East, massive increases in military spending, and the rollback of Constitutional civil liberties.
Reynolds stated that everyone in the worldwide intelligence community knew that 9/11 was an inside job as soon as it happened, with the obvious stand-down of US air defenses, controlled demolition of the World Trade Center, and non-protection of the President in Florida being the biggest tip-offs. The head of the Russian equivalent of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the former head of the German intelligence service Andreas Von Bulow, former National Security Agency official Wayne Madsen, and former MI-6 agent David Schayler have all openly called 9/11 an inside job, while former CIA official Ray McGovern has confirmed this directly in private, and indirectly in public by way of his ringing endorsement of David Ray Griffin’s work on 9/11.
Reynolds, who served as George W. Bush’s Labor Department Chief Economist in 2001-2002, believes that a 9/11 truth victory is looming on the near-term horizon. He predicted that one or more of the 9/11 insiders will soon “give it up” and come forward with what they know, saying “Remember, you heard it here first.” He said that most of those complicit in the attacks did not realize how over-the-top the plot was, due to the need-to-know compartmentalization of such covert operations, and that some semi-complicit individuals will probably be coming forward. Reynolds said that most of his email acquaintances are now worried that the 9/11 truth movement is going to win, triggering the greatest Constitutional crisis in U.S. history. For Reynolds, this is less a cause for worry than for rejoicing: “We need a Constitutional crisis!”
Reynolds argued that 9/11 truth is a matter of extreme urgency, since the perpetrators seem to be preparing another 9/11-style terror hoax as a pretext for attacking Iran with nuclear weapons. He said that exposing the 9/11 fraud is the best way to stop Cheney’s plan to stage an unprovoked nuclear attack on Iran, and the military draft and Pinochet-style prison camps and death squads for dissenters that might accompany it.
Reynolds urged the audience to help educate the American public about the 9/11 inside job. Personal contact with family and friends, the internet, alternative media, and public events like this are all good educational strategies, he said, adding that a demonstration of 100,000 9/11 truth supporters at Ground Zero next year would be hard for the media to ignore.
Politicians and the media will help expose the 9/11 inside job, he said, only after the growing grassroots movement reaches critical mass. The organizers of Reynolds’ talk urged audience members to come to the upcoming international 9/11 truth conference in Chicago, 9/11: Revealing the Truth, Reclaiming Our Future, June 2nd-4th, 2006:  http://911revealingthetruth.org
* * *
Introduction to Dr. Reynolds Presentation
(delivered in much abbreviated form due to time constraints)
by Dr. Kevin Barrett
Coordinator, Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance for 9/11 Truth: http://mujca.com
Member, Scholars for 9/11 Truth: http://st911.org
Member, Scientific Professionals Investigating 9/11 (SPINE): http://911physics.net
Friends, we are gathered here today not just to speak truth to power, but to start fighting back. The information you are hearing today is political dynamite. It is the stuff of which revolutions are made.
Evil rulers use divide-and-conquer strategies against their subjects. In Iraq, the occupiers blow up mosques and markets, and murder thousands of bystanders, in a lame attempt to provoke a Sunni-Shia civil war. But they’re not fooling anybody. The Iraqis all know who’s really doing these bombings, just as 90% of the Arab and Muslim world knows that 9/11 was an inside job. Here in Ersatz America, our criminal rulers are trying to divide us by whipping up emotional hysteria: abortion, immigration, gay marriage, liberal versus conservative, religious versus secular, Christian and Jewish versus Muslim—anything to distract us and keep us from seeing what they’re doing to all of us.
9/11 truth unites ALL of us – left and right, gay and straight, religious, spiritual and secular, Muslim, Christian and Jewish, military and civilian – in revolutionary outrage against this evil regime, and in determination to overthrow it by any means necessary.
We hope the 9/11 truth revolution will be a nonviolent revolution. We are starting with education, symbolism, and nonviolent action. Please honor the request of Veterans for 9/11 Truth ( http://v911t.org) to fly the American flag upside down as a symbol of Constitutional distress. And please come to Chicago for the international 9/11 truth strategy conference June 2nd – 4th, sponsored by 911truth.org and the Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance for 9/11 Truth. Posters are available at the table outside. We are meeting in Chicago to figure out how to win on 9/11 truth. And we are going to win. See: http://911revealingthetruth.org
And when we win, the brave man we have invited here today will get a big chunk of the credit.
Dr. Morgan Reynolds is Professor Emeritus at Texas A & M University. He served as Chief Economist in the Department of Labor under George W. Bush during the Cheney regime’s first illegitimate term. He is the former director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis, and appeared on innumerable political discussion shows in the mainstream media – back when we used to have a mainstream media rather than a Ministry of Propaganda. I’m sorry, I shouldn’t say that – it’s the Ministry of Love. Wait a minute, that’s the one that runs Abu Ghraib and the sex torture gulag. Or is that der Ministry of Unheimlich Insecurity? I’m sorry, I grew up back when we had something vaguely resembling a democracy –I can’t keep all this stuff straight. In any case, Dr. Reynolds has a stellar resume, and the best part of it is that he is a Wisconsin Badger with three degrees from this great university – and he is living up to its motto, The Truth Will Set You Free! Ladies and gentlemen, Dr. Morgan Reynolds.
* * *
(For Morgan Reynolds’ work, see his website http://nomoregames.net)
 e-mail:: kevin@mujca.com
 Homepage:: http://mujca.com
bizarre
08.05.2006 - 02:04
This is the guy who thinks there is no evidence that commercial jets hit the WTC towers on 9/11. Look at his website. Think about it.
reader>
not really
08.05.2006 - 10:03
It wasn't really "standing room only." My friend and I were the only ones in our row. I'm all about the 911 truth cause, however I was very unimpressed with Morgan Reynolds. He was working for the White House when this happened, yet he had no other information to present other than what the "Loose Change" video had already stated.
becki>
9/11 and October Surprise scandal
08.05.2006 - 11:45
Google Search: "Arrest Bush 41"
David Howard>
e-mail:: fiat@sofnet.com
Homepage:: http:// Stoelting Ultrascribe polygraph
EXACTLY
08.05.2006 - 14:08
this man speaks with credible knowledge and tells nothing but the truth. people, you need to stop letting these ridiculous explanations given by the government of what happened on 9/11 control your own decision making. if you research, you will find out that the 9/11 Commission Report contains extensive amounts of disinformation. a lot of key testimony and research was ommited from the report. there are way too many holes in the official explantion. PLEASE PEOPLE - DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH - STOP TAKING EVERYTHING THE GOVERNMENT TELLS YOU AS GOSPEL
www.universalseed.com>
Homepage:: http://www.universalseed.com
Pathetic
08.05.2006 - 22:46
This man is pathetic. He is a coward. Go get them WASPS.
IF IT WAS A FALSE FLAG ATTACK INTENDED TO BLAME ARABS, THEN JEWS DID IT YOU DAMN COWARD.
Download "Awaken and Avenge"
The ONLY 9/11 video to "name the jew"
http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=33323
Johnny>
History
09.05.2006 - 13:42
obviously 911 is a very old tactic used throughout history, check out the 2 parts at
http://www.supportthetruth.com
because those who do not know history are condemned to repeat it, since as long as we are ignorant of their tactics, they'll use the over and over and ...
glowform>
thats right
09.05.2006 - 14:08
Yes, airplanes did not hit the WTC's, the footage is fake. Look and see the fake insert airplane in all the TV coverage, not to mention the myriad photos, and stills from fake video, of airplanes with invisible wings and the like.
BBC North Tower NO AIRPLANE.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/1535000/video/_1538186_wtc_firstcrash_vi.ram
CNN North Tower NO AIRPLANE.
http://www.cnn.com/video/us/2001/09/12/first.plane.hits.gp.med.ram
CNN South Tower Footage FAKE INSERT AIRPLANE,
http://www.positiontoknow.com/S-11/vid/wtc2-p.mpeg
CHECK ALL YOUR FOOTAGE FOLKS.
Brian>
e-mail:: me@nospam.com
His truth is based on forensic evidence
09.05.2006 - 15:02
Morgan Reynolds bases his truth on the crash video given us by the Establishment. Who, other than God, could make an airliner disappear into a steel and concrete tower by defying Newton's Laws of Motion. Watch a crash video and try to detect the airliner's deceleration as it crashes against the mighty tower. Wow! Why would God cause this to happen? Airliners don't meld into buildings, they crash against them.
Joseph M. Keith>
e-mail:: joseph.keith@cox.net
very bizarre
09.05.2006 - 15:07
bizarre
This is the guy who thinks there is no evidence that commercial jets hit the WTC towers on 9/11. Look at his website. Think about it.
reader>
They were not commercial jets, they were military painted in commercial airliner colors....dont you remember the witnesses whom said their were no passenger windows...wake up dude
Truth knower>
Rothschild
09.05.2006 - 16:43
911 Masterminds
As long as the 911 movement only looks at the obvious low level criminals nothing will ever change. The system of corruption in the US Government has been in place longer than anyone living today has been around. Our government is controlled and overrun with Zionists. Just to clarify; Zionists are Jews and Christians who goal is the establishment of the state of Israel in Palestine, an area they were never from.
To stop Government crimes and corruption, the crimes have to be traced back to the masterminds.
Cut off the head of the beast and the body and the limbs die!
Who is coving up and selling a farce?
The Bush group, NO DOUBT, but the Mainstream Media is just dead obvious.
Five major corporations own nearly all of the World’s Media.
Movies, Music, Television, Newspapers, Magazines and Radio are all owned and controlled by a small group of Zionists who are under the umbrella and protection of the World Bankers who own our Federal Reserve and who funded and ultimately own all of the major Corporations and Banks.
If you want the Masterminds to expose themselves just demand that congress repeal the Federal Reserve Act. JFK did sign into law a bill, repealing the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, but he was assassinated six months latter.
Interestingly enough, on the very day of Kennedy’s murder, Johnson reversed it on Air-force One.
The Don today is Edmond Rothschild!
He and all his minions are behind all of it.
The Rothschild Family has been behind all of the problems of the world since the late 1700’s.
Just follow the money trail.
Who is bribing and blackmailing our congress? AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee)! Jack Abramoff!
Israel Is Rothschild baby. The Rothschild symbol is on the flag of Israel as well as on the back of our one dollar bill. The picture of a Rothschild is even on Israel’s paper money.
He who issues the currency is King of the world.
Since false history is created and sold to the ignorant masses by this Organized Crime Organization, everything you think you know is a lie.
To begin to learn the truth of how our modern world works you will need to learn the history that only the top economists know.
Learn the truth here:
http://www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_Rothschild.htm Rothschild History.
http://www.americanfreepress.net/ Books on the Mainstream Media Ownership.
http://judicial-inc.biz/Dov_zakheim.htm Running the Pentagon during 911.
http://rightweb.irc-online.org/charts/pnac-chart.htm PNAC; Find the Zionists.
http://www.wrmea.com/archives/July_Aug_2004/0407027.html Lobby payouts through 2004.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article7545.htm Fox News Series; Israel Spying on the US.
http://www.themoneymasters.com/orderform.html Buy this DVD!
After viewing this material you will be right on top of what they are up to and you won’t get fooled again.
Bill Schultz>
e-mail:: wrssmf@bresnan.net
The Federal Reserve
09.05.2006 - 17:04
The Government is controled and owned by the private bankers.
Everything that happens is orchestrated by them.
Learn how they control the United states here:
http://www.wtv-zone.com/Mary/FEDERALRESERVE.HTML
Bill Schultz>
e-mail:: wrssmf@bresnan.net
Flight 93 History Being Re-Written
09.05.2006 - 18:45
I've been doing my own research since 9/11/2001. I'll never forget the look in the eyes of the pilot who intercepted Flight 93, and was interviewed on Dateline or some show like that. He had lie in his eyes as he testified that Flight 93 just did a nose dive and crashed. The early stories I've downloaded say over and over again that wreckage from Flight 93 was strewn over at least 2 miles of countryside as if the plane was blown up in the air and pieces fell to the ground. Now in 2006 in the days of the Hollywood movie about Flight 93 we are officially told that the wreckage was all in a v-shaped hole in the ground in Pennsylvania. I never read anything like that from 2001 till 2004, but now the story is that the wreckage as all in one big pile. I'd say someone is re-writing some history here. That's why I started downloading. I knew a lot of that information was going to disappear from the mainstream.
Davol>
e-mail:: dajson@newcity.com
Homepage:: http://www.fantazine.net/dajpage
It's worse than you think
09.05.2006 - 21:10
Cheney and the Neocons are simply genetically determined psychopaths trying to maximize their safety (survivability actually) in the coming era of genetic knowledge. The severe police state is the whole point.
http://winnipeg.indymedia.org/item.php?1596S
elmo38>
noise and the left wing...
09.05.2006 - 22:28
check your videos when the airplanes "crash" in WTC....there's no noise of explosion when flight 11 "crashes" just the sound of an airplane that keeps going....going... going.......
and with the south tower play it in super slow motion put attention before the airplane "crashes" (left wing disapears)
jerry>
e-mail:: gerardo55@msn.com
911 Clowns (holgrams, pods, and no-planers)
10.05.2006 - 02:11
There is no such thing as semi-complicit, just as there is no such thing as semi-intentional.
Angry, bellicose, rude and extremely hostile agents spraying clown paint whenever the issue of 911 is mentioned - easily detected with their whacky no-planes and holograms and pod-missiles -- shoud be treated with contempt and revulsion by all genuine researchers.
But these cretinous psychopathic pack-animals perpetualy harass, abuse and defame anyone who dares to call them into account, and they do so as drones in swarm mode. Intimidation works!! So what we have is a so-called "truth" movement that is little more than a river of counter intelligent fecal matter, designed to keep everyone confused, misinformed, and divided over "hot button issues", such as that American Airlines Boeing 757 THAT REALLY DID SLAM INTO THE PENTAGON, according to ALL WITNESSES PRESENT, including Lt. Col. Steve O'Brien of the Minessotta A.N.G., who accompanied that Boeing through several miles of restricted airspace ---- in a gray C-130 NAVAL ELECTRONIC WARFARE AIRCRAFT.
Isn't it amazing that the so-called "truth" movement hasn't worked out what the word "counterintelligence" means?
Turing - computational authenticity>
Reynolds a Great Hero
10.05.2006 - 04:05
I have listened to Morgan Reynolds on archived radio shows, I've read his articles on Lew Rockwell, and I applaude him. Oh that we had men and woman of spine in great numbers come forth and speak as boldly as he has been doing. In such boldness, and in large numbers, this "vicious, oath bound and secret organization bent on evil and destruction" would be brought down and it's agenda for a Fascist Police State and "New World" as David Rockefeller calls it, would be frustrated.
Bravo Morgan, I reverence men who now stand up and speak in bold terms against this internal cabal of traitorous murderers.
Men Like this help stay off a coming day of destruction. The more we as a society allow and tolerate these userpers who "woo the people with sophistry" as they "take control of the society," the more we deliver ourselves up to the hardness of our hearts and blindness of our minds, leading to destruction, and in so doing, we forfiet the protection of the God of Heaven over this Land of America, a land that the Founding Fathers acknowledged was their great aid in their winning a battle over the greatest military might upon the globe in their time. This came about by "Divine Providence" and the Founders spoke of this and gave praise to the Almighty for this.
We need this help and aid in our time, and we shall have it if we will stand brave and on principle, the correct principles that the Founders risked their "lives, fortunes" and their "sacred honor," to establish. Morgan Reynolds is one of those rare men of our time who is making such great risks, and I applaude him for it.
Shaun Knapp>
Homepage:: http://www.awakeandarise.org
wake up
10.05.2006 - 11:11
wake up people and stop believing everything your told by the media........and think who owns the media all americans and canadians alike have to wake up and smell the coffee there will be another attack soon mark my works.......and it will be said to be from iran just to get people on board with invading them..........
im sick of the useless loss of life and it has to stop
stunned at the stupid uninformed people>
e-mail:: domi_rocks@hotmail.com
Freedom LOST
10.05.2006 - 12:36
With G.Wacko Bush allowed to still be in the Oval Office as a puppeteer of Chaney & CIA , it's a small wonder that they haven't used NUKES on IRAN.
9-11-01 WTC Disaster was BUSH ADMINISTRATION RAT PACK planned and caused by these bastards for excuse to drag America into IRAQI -WAR. WHY DO AMERICANS ALLOW this crap to rule the country?.
CONGRESS is GUILTY ALSO..
IT takes only a SENATE FEW to IMPEACH THIS LOT.
ARROGANT LEADERS will see the cities in DUST .
A BIBLE QUOTE..
Don>
The Neo Nazi and Neo Zionists
10.05.2006 - 12:47
NUMBER ONE - The ENTIRE Bush Family are NAZIS.
SOURCE: http://www.streamdump.com/videos/display.php?h=bfb2f2
NUMBER TWO: The Zionists COLLABORATED WITH HITLER, not against him.
Source: http://www.counterpunch.org/brenner1223.html
NUMBER THREE: The Jewish Masonic Zionists are the Pope's foot soldiers for the re-establisment of Israel and the re-construction of the Temple of Solomon, wherein the Pope will be high priest of the Temple.
Source: http://www.templemountfaithful.org/
http://www.aloha.net/~mikesch/temple_mount_and_the_vatican.htm
http://freemasonrywatch.org/templemount.html
The Temple Mount has been given to the Vatican:
SOURCE: http://www.sdadefend.com/Jerusalem%206.htm
http://www.barrychamish.com/html/road_rome.htm
The Present Pope is a Nazi:
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Benedict_XVI
Rothschild is the Pope's international banker, located in the "semi-sovereign" enclave known as the "City of London".
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_London
AND BEFORE the Rothschilds became the Pope's international banker, it was a family whose last name was FUGGER - JACOB FUGGER THE RICH as he was called.
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fugger
NUMBER FOUR: The PRESENT GLOBAL economic system is nothing more than a biblical condition known as SLAVERY BY USURY. The present model is based on the GOLDSMITH FRUAD of the middle ages, wherein a banker creates money simply by printing it, THEN LOANING IT out AT INTEREST to GOVERNMENT, the usury extracted and paid back to the ISSUERS (the initiators of the Fraud) in the form of Taxation. It is a fraud and an abomination to God. It was OFFSET in Biblical Times by a decree from GOD which was called THE JUBILEE.
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=jubilee
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jubilees
Number Five:
If history is an indicator, send your mouths way down souths and kiss your asses goodbye.
Nazis rule the US. Nazis rule the Vatican. And Nazis rule Israel.
And people STILL think the Nazis lost WWII. World War II never ended.
End of discussion.
Armored Saint>
idiot
10.05.2006 - 15:03
response to turing.....IDIOT....i said check the videos that you have and put attention to the noise (north tower)and the left wing of the 2nd. before the "crash".
jerry>
e-mail:: gerardo55@msn.com
typical
10.05.2006 - 16:15
>>response to turing.....IDIOT
What an eloquent response to defend the idea that planes didn't hit buildings on 9/11!
And yet, such remarks are the norm among those insisting that 'there was no plane!,' 'a missile hit!,' 'The Jews Did It!,' etc.
activist>
Evil coming home to roost
11.05.2006 - 09:54
I lost my Hotmail ID days after 9/11. Why? because I insisted on newsgroups that 9/11 didn't look kosher. That there were too many people screaming for blood & later that the cleanup was going way too fast.
I suggested that 'officials' -who couldn't predict the incident!- were pretty certain Bin Laden was behind it... conveniently fast. Conveniently after a series of A&E Biographies on how evil he was.
Then he SAID he didn't do it: odd for a 'terrorist'. Then he said he did (but I'd already lost my ID). When I inquired of MicroSoft's Hotmail, I was told I'd been reported for *seditious behavior* because I insisted that if the CIA couldn't pin the tail on the donkey, they'd quickly find one.
They would HAVE to: the Public was baying for retribution.
I pointed out that Bin Laden has a Master's Degree in ECONOMICS from an OLD school. To me, the MOST EFFECTIVE terrorist attack would be something shocking & something that would require BILLIONS of dollars to 'rectify' Public fear. To do to the US what they did to the -albeit a nasty regime- USSR.
Nobody cared. I was collaborating by suggesting that the CIA & FBI couldn't be trusted.
Nice to know I've been vindicated, along with being tagged somewhere as a 'bad apple' from Canada.
My new theory? Canada is going to be treated as an off-site resource. If Corporatists could get away with it, they'd treat us like Saipan. To whom does the U.S. owe the $$$???
Diligence my Friends, diligence.
Namaste
BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
ThisCanadian.com
"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"
BlueBerry Pick'n is ThisCanadian.com>
Homepage:: http://www.ThisCanadian.com
DEVILS SERVANT
12.05.2006 - 13:13
BUSH may appear to be KING OF THE WORLD but to the DEMON masterminds he serves, he is just another Slave.. like all of his GANG who think they stole the Country/World. One day ther Devil will do away with him jsut as easily as he did/does away with so many souls...
TRUTH IS LIGHT AND THE LIGHT IS SHINING ON YOU, MR. BUSH.
GALLIANO>
e-mail:: shareprayers@yahoo.com
Bush IS COMPLICIT
12.05.2006 - 23:03
Mr Bush
This website http://www.Bush911Video.com proves that Bush/ government are behind 9/11! It has a bunch of streaming videos including Loose Change and Citizens being hauled out of the room asking the questions that nobody had the guts to ask! Bin Laden is a CIA asset and will NEVER be found.
Jeff H.>
Homepage:: http://www.Bush911Video.com
Bush IS COMPLICIT
12.05.2006 - 23:03
This website http://www.Bush911Video.com proves that Bush/ government are behind 9/11! It has a bunch of streaming videos including Loose Change and Citizens being hauled out of the room asking the questions that nobody had the guts to ask! Bin Laden is a CIA asset and will NEVER be found.
Jeff H.>
Homepage:: http://www.Bush911Video.com
Bush is COMPLICIT
12.05.2006 - 23:20
TRUTH
This website http://www.Bush911Video.com proves that Bush/ government are behind 9/11! It has a bunch of streaming videos including Loose Change and Citizens being hauled out of the room asking the questions that nobody had the guts to ask! Bin Laden is a CIA asset and will NEVER be found.
Jeff H.>
Homepage:: http://www.bush911video.com
Bush is COMPLICIT
12.05.2006 - 23:20
This website http://www.Bush911Video.com proves that Bush/ government are behind 9/11! It has a bunch of streaming videos including Loose Change and Citizens being hauled out of the room asking the questions that nobody had the guts to ask! Bin Laden is a CIA asset and will NEVER be found.
Jeff H.>
Homepage:: http://www.bush911video.com
Standing Room only
16.05.2006 - 23:57
"It wasn't really "standing room only." My friend and I were the only ones in our row." Really? Because the two renta cops outside told people they were exceeding the fire limit, so if you arrived late you had to stay outside. Maybe your row was the only empty row, but from what I could see, the room was full. Not that it was that big anyway, but talk about missing the forest for the trees.
Anyway.
I think overall Reynolds gave a good speech. I mean, folks aren't falling over themselves to commit career suicide (or literally for that matter), so kudos to those who stand up. Reynolds is a good speaker, calm reasoned, good arguments, interesting take - especially the latter part about what the heck will it take for congress to get a move on this. There's alot of misinformation, some of it on purpose, some just plane crazy, ideally this will improve as more people get involved. Yes, Reynolds was critiqued by the WTC 7 Research site (now down for some reason?), but he responded with his points. This is what democracy is all about.
MKrueger>
How I came to appreciate the 9/11 situation
17.05.2006 - 00:48
I was in London on business last year and saw an intrguing book - The New Pearl Harbor - by David Ray Griffin. I bought it on a lark. I read it and it changed my worldview forever. Then I secured Dr. Griffin's book on the Commission coverup and went on to read everything I could find on 9/11.
The circumstantial evidence is overwhelming. Proof depends on someone coming forward who was "in" on what went down. In the meantime, I am most moved by the answer to the first question asked by criminal investigators in all crime contexts: who stood to gain from the crime. The answer to this is so obvious it need not be restated.
My concern now is that the government will use another such event to restore the public approval of the Bush administration before November and also perhaps as a pretext for hitting Iran. We need to be extremely vigilant hereafter and be "on the crime scene" if there is another "terrorist attack" at a convenient time. In the meantime, the 9/11 truth mission must continue in hopes that someone from the inside will come forward as a patriotic American and tell us what we need to know to pursue the matter legally. This is far and away the most urgent matter on the agenda of our nation. No one wants a crisis...but the truth cannot be hidden this time. Too much is at stake for America and the world.
Hats off to the courageous folks who have not let this issue die. Doubly so now that I have seen the just-released video of the "757" hitting the pentagon. I am not an expert on things that fly...but whatever that thing was that hit the Pentagon sure didn't look like the hundreds of 757s I have flown on over the last two decades! Take a look for yourself. The video is viewable at AOL and surely elsewhere. Ask: is that a 757 or something else?
I intend to be down in Rosemont in June for the big gathering. I am eager to learn more. All I want is a fair and open examination of 9/11, with evidence from both sides. No control by a Bush-ite filtering content. In my heart, I want to believe it was terrorists and that all the circumstantial evidence is flawed. In my head, I can no longer come to that wishful conclusion. I gave a copy of one of the 9/11 books to a friend who is a brilliant actuary. He believed the official story before he read it. Now he is "99% sure" that the government was either passively (as in "stand down") or actively involved. That speaks volumes to me.
Hank George>
False flag terrorism? Highly likely.
18.05.2006 - 10:52
Everything I've seen connected with "9/11" stinks, more or less, but it seems highly likely to me that it was in some measure some kind of an "inside" job. Since the gut feeling of many is much the same, though, the whole story is easily confused beyond (the perpetrators hope) ever unravelling what actually happened.
For starters, the government itself clearly has some sort of interest in destroying any credible evidence - seizing video tapes, destroying the building wreckage, etc. And spinning obvious and blatant falsehoods, like pretending building 7 wasn't demolished deliberately. And being oddly uninterested in the bizarre collapse of the main buildings - either they too were deliberately demolished (a murderous act) or they were dangerously defective in their construction (buildings like that are supposed to withstand aircraft strike and are not supposed to collapse from fire). At the very least, the failure of the buildings ought to merit considerably closer scrutiny of the wreckage, so that future buildings might be better proof against such attacks. There are enough unaccountable flaws in the government response to suggest to me that they're hiding something, though I confess to a bias or predisposition to believe that. It's just possible, granted, that they're simply incompetent en-masse.
But then you have the confounding effects of disinformation. Taking the theory that elements of the administration at the very least don't want anyone to know what the hell happened (because the administration has much to gain from spinning it their way, as with the nonexistant Iraqi weapons and so on) then it's reasonable to assume that certain affiliates of the culprits, or the cover-up culprits, will be out there spinning plausibly deniable "alternative" conspiracy-theories which boatloads of the gullible and genuinely loopy will seize upon, elaborate and run with. The effect is to dilute and diffuse disagreement with the "official" story.
Helping things along, obviously, will be all the pre-existing conspiracy theorists with some or other political or racial axe to grind. So we have everything from Atlantean lizard-creatures thru Zionists held up, in earnest belief, as the "real" culprits behind it all. All of which an administration with little interest in asking too many awkward questions and a keen interest in milking the situation for (probably financial) advantage can point at and say "see, they're all nutters, none of them can be taken seriously."
Y'see the problems with conspiracy theories are several-fold: One problem is that traditionally they're often proposed and supported by obvious loonies; Another is that for a proper conspiracy to hold together, the conspirators must all be extraordinarily careful to keep cover, and the more people need to be involved to make it happen, the less likely it is that everyone involved will keep quiet.
On the other hand, no-one fundamentally wants to believe, despite much credible and irrefutable evidence, that their country's administration contains many a cold-blooded murderer who is unlikely to differentiate much between killing random American strangers or random Iraqi strangers (say), if the money's good. Also, if you do something unbelievable, then, by definition, it's easy to point at people who accuse you of doing it and say "c'mon, no-one will believe that, you're a lunatic".
The "conspiracy" needn't be that big or that direct - the people who play out the event don't need to be "in" on what's going on. Maybe Arab (Saudi, let's not forget) terrorists *did* plot to hijack airliners and fly them into the WTC - it's an idea which has been kicking about for ages, someone wrote a book about something similar and the US forces responsible for training terrorists to destabilise foreign countries have advocated using airliners as missiles, so it's hardly an un-thought-of scenario.
Say some ambitious nutters decided to hit the WTC with airliners - only a few people among the security services would need to say to themselves, well, let's let 'em and see whling firefighters and the remaining occupants. It's possible that the towers were just built wrong, but no-one seems bothered enough to find out. My guess, from the way they fell, is that they were brought down with explosives, or designed specifically to fail in that way.
Some "in the know" might have a sincere if misguided discomfort with admitting that the lives of those in the WTC buildings were sacrificed to avoid the wider death and destruction should the buildings have collapsed less neatly - they mightn't be covering up a crime, rather a "tough and upsetting choice", as they see it.
WTC7 was demolished (officially acknowledged, or at least not officially denied in any meaningful sense). Either that or it was constructed deliberately to cave in neatly with the mildest of provocation.
The aircraft which hit the pentagon, well, that was an interesting bit of flying by the official story, and they hid the tapes, and they released those *bizarre* few frames. I mean, either it was a coverup or the security services really, REALLY wanted it to LOOK like a coverup, to divert attention, perhaps, from the WTC "investigation".
Flight 93 was shot down. Most official denials probably again stem from a sincere discomfort with admitting that the airforce would shoot down a civilian 'plane in defense, even though it would be a tough but defensible and probably necessary response in the circumstances. Also, I think there's a general feeling among most "officials" in most circumstances that the less people know, the better.
*Could* the hijacks have played out as per the official story? Well, possibly - people in the two WTC planes mightn't put up much of a fight, not knowing the planes were to become missiles, the people in Flight 93 might have put up more of a fight having got wind of the intention, who knows.
Cell phone calls from the aircraft don't seem likely to me, because a regular cellphone isn't all that likely to connect from a moving aircraft at altitude (though at low altitude over a city they might), but aircraft these days sometimes have phones fitted for passenger use which presumably work, so that might have been careless reporting etc.
The above seem to me reasonable, if vague, inferences, which steer away from most of the more adventurous theories about missiles and so on, but they don't say anything about who was behind it. To me it seems very obvious that someone in the US administration was at the very least passively complicit, and it seems highly likely that the incident was orchestrated by some or other powerful faction in the US. And regardless of the incident itself, the US response could have gone in very different directions, but didn't, which should tell us something.
As everyone keeps saying - forensics 101, follow the money. Who stands to gain? The US has a "fiat" currency, courtesy the Federal Reserve, which is worth very little in most real terms. Nice little earner for the bankers, creating money from thin air, but at the end of the day someone, somewhere has to be productive or the whole thing collapses. The people have to work, so the bankers can live the high life. Basic economics. And foreign lands have to be asset-stripped, and donor countries need to be kept firmly in place.
The US dollar, insofar as it's backed by anything at all, is backed these days by oil, rather than (say) gold or anything else the US might have in reserve in its own right. Saudi Arabia has a lot of oil. Saudi arabia probably doesn't relish ambitious or powerful secular states next door.
All the while Saddam Hussein was busy being a tinpot despot, he was the US and UK's best mate in the middle east. "Gassing the Kurds" was never a problem, politically, while he was doing it (or earlier, when Churchill suggested doing the very same thing.) Nor was waging war on Iran, or torturing political opponents, or anything else he was noted for back in the good old days. Attempting to build an independent secular state with a public health scheme, with schools and hospitals and, crucially and unforgivably, deciding to trade oil not in dollars but in Euros, on the other hand, resulted in years of crippling economic sanctions and eventual military invasion. (While the world was being told that invasion was a possibility of last resort, American troops had their marching orders. Ask a squaddie.)
Afghanistan - before American "retribution" (for something probably perpetrated by Saudi Arabians and Americans) they, too, had schools, widespread adult literacy, hospitals, and all the rest. After being "bombed back to the stone age" they have widespread oppression of women, no modern infrastructure and a permanent state of civil unrest under a puppet government of fundamentalist nutters. Back in their place. Busy surviving this, they're no longer in a position to threaten any neighbours or refuse American "help" in securing, for example, the big oil pipelines to India and Pakistan from central Asia and the Caspian sea.
Look at Venezuela. Chavez has the gall to privitize the country's oilwells, cashing in on inflated oil prices to start providing public healthcare and education and so on. He has referendums roughly every ten minutes and is generally extremely popular with the majority of the poor, for obvious reasons, though he's not exactly popular with the rich. In America he's a "terrorist", a "threat", a "dictator". Sounds familiar enough to me. Oh, and he's trading oil in Euros, so if I was him I'd be carefully checking my meals for ground glass and so on.
Other countries now trading oil in Euros include Russia, Iran, Indonesia and Malaysia. How many of these America will hit militarily before the others roll over and revert to trading in dollars remains to be seen.
My money's on an American invasion or bombing of Iran, "unrest" and regime change of some sort in Indonesia and possibly Malaysia (possibly involving Australian and Chinese military activity) and agreements, for now, with Russia and increased (dollar) trade with China.
If oil ceases to be traded in dollars then the dollar loses its backing - America is bankrupt. I don't believe it's "that simple", insofar as there are an awful lot of conflicting agendas and complexities, but at base I suspect this is what it's about, mostly. In "real" terms America is already bankrupt - a national debt of what, umpteen trillion dollars, although paradoxically I suppose if those dollars were worth nothing then America's not really that much in debt after all...it's just that America's super-rich wouldn't actually be any more rich than the average American, and America could no longer call all the shots on the world stage, obviously things worth killing a lot of people to avoid.
"Interesting times".
C. Williams>
Not Credible
19.05.2006 - 00:16
Seriously, this guy was the Chief Economist of the Labor Department. Why would he know ANYTHING about this? Not to discredit the larger point he's trying to make, but it seems to me that this guy is just trying to parley his former office into his 15 minutes of fame.
Q>
e-mail:: signalfiller@gmail.com
Homepage:: http://signalfiller.blogspot.com
Audio / Video link ??
19.05.2006 - 06:12
Somebody must surely have recorded this important speech by Mr Reynolds?
So would you someone post a link to MP3 or vid and we can judge for ourselves on what he has to say, thanks.
If it is not available that to me is a bad sign of severely jumbled priorities/organisation OR the fact that the content does not bear much scrutiny outside the circle of True Believers.
Come on, put me out of this suspense!
Oh and keep knockin' the 911 coverup story, it is ripe for implosion, which when it comes will be like WTC-7 - sudden, unexpected and total
Best regards from Ireland
BlackPope>
Lets be serious
19.05.2006 - 09:38
I was personally in the military on 9-11. My infatry unit(the honor guard) was responsible for search and recovery in the pentagon on 9-11. Witrhin 12 hours of impact i was inside the building. I can assure you just as any person from the WTC cleanup that passanger jets were used. The theory of non-comercial airliners is known as a straw man theory. A "truth" offered by the opposition which can be easily broken later. Im not saying there was no conspiracy. But we must focus on damning FACTS such as the demolition of the towers, or the fact that a comercial airliner was flown towards the most secure building in the world unchecked for 30 mins AFTER the 2 towers had been hit. Those are facts which cannot be disproven by video evidence. Also the pentagon has on its property antiaircraft missels. You know just in case of an attack on it. I have seen them with my own eyes. Guess they must have been turned off that day. Some of you who think no jets were used should part with the tinfoil hat. you make the rest of us look like retards.
DISeased jesus>
False flag terrorism? Highly likely. (edit)
19.05.2006 - 15:48
Cut-and-paste problem with my enormous post above:
about the 8th paragraph, which begins: The "Say some ambitious nutters decided to hit the WTC with airliners" has been truncated and merged with the following para, it should read as follows:
[...]
Say some ambitious nutters decided to hit the WTC with airliners - only a few people among the security services would need to say to themselves, well, let's let 'em and see what happens, eh? A few strings pulled and some "national security" restrictions on who, exactly, is monitoring these dangerous subversives and, oh dear, they seem to have slipped through the net, what a pity.
What do I think happened? I think two big aircraft hit the twin towers, and that the towers were subsequently demolished killing firefighters and the remaining occupants. It's possible that the towers were just built wrong, but no-one seems bothered enough to find out. My guess, from the way they fell, is that they were brought down with explosives, or designed specifically to fail in that way.
[...]
C. Williams>
In serach of the truth... nanotechs?
21.05.2006 - 18:10
Is there any non official (mainstream media) video of the event showing airplanes ? I think that fool talks don't help.
In the very propable case that there were planes, the planes impacts should not have collapse the towers.
It looks like a controlled demolition. New explosives exists based on nanotechnologies (nanoscale Al/MoO3 thermites, check google), allowing to reach the fusion temperature of metal in a very short time, and this could explain why the towers melt and crashed so quickly.
See "Deep investigation page" :
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/04/338241.shtml
However like in any catastroph event, the metal parts of the collapsed towers should have been kept and analyzed. I wasn't done.
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/debris.htm
Check also this company based in texas, created in early 2001, that sells its technology to the military.
http://www.nanoscale.com/about_advisors.asp (? see investors)
http://www.nanoscale.com/about_advisors.asp
http://www.nanoscale.com/markets_nanoenergetics.asp
http://technologyreview.com/read_article.aspx?id=14105&ch=nanotech
Investigation is needed.
Electron>
Yes and Yes
21.05.2006 - 18:19
http://www.rense.com/general17/eyewitnessreportspersist.htm
Airplanes yes, explosives yes.
No conspirational theory with strange jet or no planes at all : these theories are build by the people that don't want the truth to appear and inserted into the alternative medias. The goal is to make all truth searchers appear as fool people globally.
This is infowar guys. Keep your head cold.
Electron>
Eyewitnessed the News
24.05.2006 - 16:03
Slipplane
One of the most ridiculous statements that I've heard made by skeptics and deniers (hey if Bush can say decider, I can say deniers) is that THEY saw the plane hit the building from California or whereever they happened to be. Which makes it a fact that a plane hit the building. They seen an image on the television set that the news put out. I believed that I saw a plane hit the building that morning too from my living room in Orange, CA. I did. But that doesn't mean that is exactly what occurred in Manhatten that morning. I'm not saying it didn't either. What I find interesting is that the transcripts of people who were actually there at the crime scene are not all in agreement that a plane hit the buildings. I've read every transcript made available on the memory hole, there are numerous reports that missiles were being shot from the Woolworth bldg. There are also numerous reports of the smell of burning jet fuel. They have been using jet fuel instead of regular fuel in Iraq as a napalm mixture too though. So the jet fuel could be attributed to what eyewitnesses at the actual scene reported. Another interesting thing I noticed while reading all of the transcripts is most of those who agreed that a plane hit Tower 2 heard it from a family member who called to see if the person was alright.
So before discounting that there might not have been a plane, I suggest reading these transcripts. Here's an excerpt of what I'm talking about:
From page 21 of 100 The Port Authority of NY & NJ PA Police Reports 01
http://www.thememoryhole.org/911/pa-transcripts/pa-police-reports01.pdf
0904: 2 WTC hit by second aircraft.
0904: Unidentified unit makes transmission of an explosion in 2 WTC.
0904: Sgt. DeVona confers with Director Morrone and Inspector Infante at the Fire Starters Desk.
0905: Sgt. Polland radios Captain Whitaker and states that second plane hit 2 WTC. Detective Sgt. Zika states he had a visual and it could’ve been a possible missle.
0907: Sgt. DeVona makes third request to WTC Police Desk for every available EMS unit to respond. Police Desk responds that people are trapped on the upper floors.
0908: Detective McHale radios WTC Police Desk that a second plane has hit.
0908: Detective McHale radios WTC Police Desk stating NYPD of Bomb Squad says 2 WTC has been hit.
0908 Detective Sgt. Zika reports possible missile launch off of the Woolworth building and requests to have CPD contact NYPD check the Woolworth building.
I suggest also visiting http://www.math.missouri.edu/~rich/911/gehue/gehue/ and checking out plate 54. If the media is part of the conspiracy (very well possible since NBC is owned by General Electric who received a huge defense contract in Iraq) isn't it possible they might have photoshopped these images prior to that morning? We may never know what the truth is...including the official "truth" that a plane did fly into the building.
Gina Judd>
Eyewitnessed the News
24.05.2006 - 16:07
One of the most ridiculous statements that I've heard made by skeptics and deniers (hey if Bush can say decider, I can say deniers) is that THEY saw the plane hit the building from California or whereever they happened to be. Which makes it a fact that a plane hit the building. They seen an image on the television set that the news put out. I believed that I saw a plane hit the building that morning too from my living room in Orange, CA. I did. But that doesn't mean that is exactly what occurred in Manhatten that morning. I'm not saying it didn't either. What I find interesting is that the transcripts of people who were actually there at the crime scene are not all in agreement that a plane hit the buildings. I've read every transcript made available on the memory hole, there are numerous reports that missiles were being shot from the Woolworth bldg. There are also numerous reports of the smell of burning jet fuel. They have been using jet fuel instead of regular fuel in Iraq as a napalm mixture too though. So the jet fuel could be attributed to what eyewitnesses at the actual scene reported. Another interesting thing I noticed while reading all of the transcripts is most of those who agreed that a plane hit Tower 2 heard it from a family member who called to see if the person was alright.
So before discounting that there might not have been a plane, I suggest reading these transcripts. Here's an excerpt of what I'm talking about:
From page 21 of 100 The Port Authority of NY & NJ PA Police Reports 01
http://www.thememoryhole.org/911/pa-transcripts/pa-police-reports01.pdf
0904: 2 WTC hit by second aircraft.
0904: Unidentified unit makes transmission of an explosion in 2 WTC.
0904: Sgt. DeVona confers with Director Morrone and Inspector Infante at the Fire Starters Desk.
0905: Sgt. Polland radios Captain Whitaker and states that second plane hit 2 WTC. Detective Sgt. Zika states he had a visual and it could’ve been a possible missle.
0907: Sgt. DeVona makes third request to WTC Police Desk for every available EMS unit to respond. Police Desk responds that people are trapped on the upper floors.
0908: Detective McHale radios WTC Police Desk that a second plane has hit.
0908: Detective McHale radios WTC Police Desk stating NYPD of Bomb Squad says 2 WTC has been hit.
0908 Detective Sgt. Zika reports possible missile launch off of the Woolworth building and requests to have CPD contact NYPD check the Woolworth building.
I suggest also visiting http://www.math.missouri.edu/~rich/911/gehue/gehue/ and checking out plate 54. If the media is part of the conspiracy (very well possible since NBC is owned by General Electric who received a huge defense contract in Iraq) isn't it possible they might have photoshopped these images prior to that morning? We may never know what the truth is...including the official "truth" that a plane did fly into the building.
Gina Judd>
current action
17.01.2007 - 23:32
hello my names morgan funnyily enough, i was wondering what investigations are going on right now if any any, im also interested if the hearing was a success and how clos 9/11 truth activists are in achieving their goals, id like to become apart of the movement but i live in australia and am only of 17 years on age, please get back to me especially about what investigations and goals have been achieved or website reference to this information, and if there is anything i can do
Morgan antill>
e-mail:: vault_Hill@hotmail.com
JESUS IS COMING SOON BUT FIRST
03.02.2007 - 23:24
THE 9/11 DEMONIC ATTACK IS IN THE BIBLE..YES..IN THE BOOK OF ISAIAH 30:25
FOLKS PLEASE UNDERSTAND...WE ARE LIVING P=R=O=P=H=E=C=Y...THIS "PLAN" IS
OLD IS ALL ABOUT THE ANTI-CHRIST AND THE "NEW WORLD ORDER"...AND IS NO
JOKE...IS ALL COMING TOGETHER REVELATION 13:16 "THE MARK OF THE BEAST" IS
THE 666 MARK UNDER THE SKIN THAT EVERYBODY WILL BE OBLIGUED TO USE OR BE
PUT IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP...9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB...THE ROTHSCHILD PUT
THE "PICTURE" OF THE TOWERS IN FIRE IN THE $20 DOLLAR BILL...AND THE $1
DOLLAR BILL IS FULL OF "MESSAGES" OF "THE NEW WORLD ORDER" AND THE NEAR
COMING OF THE FALSE MESSIAH...GET J=E=S=U=S...THE CHRIST ! BEFORE
"THEY" IMPOSE US THE ANTI-CHRIST...GOD BLESS THE WORLD...(WE ALL NEED IT)
THE PROPHET>
What the...
13.03.2007 - 02:36
Before posting, I thought, "Man, where do I start?"
I decided to start here...
[b]When I was watching the news coverage of the 9/11 tragedy, and saw the first tower collapse, the very first thing that came in my mind was...
NO WAY!
Then another tower collapsed, and I caught myself saying out loud...
NO F*ING WAY!
Then the third building collapsed later...
I was dumfounded, astonished, unbelieving! (And just keep adding to the list, if you want). I knew right away, in my gut, something was very, very wrong![/b]
I still say, "NO WAY", but without the 'F' word. Why no 'F' word now?
(BTW, I really don’t mean to preach. Honestly!)
After (almost) my whole life of struggling with religion/s and (their) different beliefs, I finally know, I finally know... I FINALLY KNOW... there is surely a God!
During my life, many, many years ago, actually, I read the entire Bible from cover to cover. Did I learn much? Not really, other than I was more than likely going to ‘hell’. Was I scared? Yes and no. Yes, well, because it can make you think. I mean, the time (/Book) of Revelation can be, and is, frightening! ‘Hell’ does not look so promising either. :-p No, because, since I was not a true believer, I could dismiss it as so much, to be polite, I could dismiss it as just so many words.
In my lifetime, I have said to myself, so many times, “If I could ‘see’ Jesus in my life time, I would truly believe.” Well, maybe I have never seen Jesus in my lifetime, but I have seen the Word of God.
Many of the words of ‘certain’ politicians are, as I can read and hear, many of the exact words that are in the Bible. (The Bible as I know it. The King James Versions of the Old and New Testament.) - Does, “New World Order” sound familiar? Yes. In the future, after that is in place, how about, “The Mark of the Beast”? Hmmm.
New World Order, the Mark, identity cards, embedded microchip [I]in our body[/I]! YUK!
OK. I am still researching 9/11. (I have been for years, but for some reason, more so lately.) So far, to me, it looks really bad for us Americans, and the world as a whole. A persons mind has to ‘overcome’ preconceived notions, beliefs, and what we have been taught (from a parent, school whatever/where ever). - IF I have to make ‘the call’ right this second though, I would call FOUL!
Anyway, thank you for reading. I want use any more of your time other than to write a few short things, in short sentences.
Keep an open mind.
Do the research.
Be able to see good, and/or bad… surely do your best to see the truth.
Remember the Golden Rule.
Know that, no matter what, there is still hope for every human (and animal, etc)!
(The above ‘stuff’ just popped into my head, and sorry, ‘you’ probably already know it.)
Oh, I apologize for more… a short story:
An atheist and a believer were having a discussion about whether or not there was an ‘entity’… a GOD. Finally, the believer asked the atheist what would he do if he died then found out there really was a God. After a long pause, the atheists reply, “Uh Oh”. - Don’t allow your self to be caught saying ‘uh oh’.
Peace, and have a good life! God Bless You!
PS
Morgan Reynolds (and those like him), keep it up!
A couple of links:
[URL= http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5755767598909426732]America: Freedom To Fascisim (Trailer)[/URL]
[URL= http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4312730277175242198]America: Freedom To Fascisim (Full Movie)[/URL]
[URL= http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501&q=loose+change+recut]Loose Change - 2nd Edition[/URL]
.
Just a People>
buy avandia
14.08.2007 - 20:13
nice news thanks!Regenon
buy avandia>
e-mail:: hf@joke.com
Homepage:: http://kenalog
buy simvastatin
14.08.2007 - 20:54
nice news thanks!Dormicum
buy simvastatin>
e-mail:: hf@joke.com
Homepage:: http://zanaflex
Media Complicity on 9-11 - There Were No Plan
04.01.2008 - 22:23
If one seeks only that evidence which fits the official explanation, then that is what you will find. That’s not science, it’s not objective thinking, it’s not even good common sense. Contrary to NIST & the US Government, there is overwhelming evidence that the planes were the result of SFX TV fakery. Many try to suppress this obvious fact, but to exclude other theories out of hand w/o examination is to be foolish and only results in a misinformed, biased opinion.
Esoteric knowledge and symbolism aside, there were no planes entering the WTC Towers on 911. Perhaps all the related films produced before and since were made to condition the public into acceptance of the official “planes” fantasy.
Believing the government’s fairytale of planes colliding with the Towers is the main problem w/ fully understanding 911. The media was broadcasting fake, manipulated images of planes. Superimposing a plane on 911 was done w/ Wescam technology; it provided a single “live” feed from which all the TV networks broadcast. Other videos & images started to appear in the days, weeks & months following 911. All of them have anomalies & impossibilities which can only be explained by excluding planes.
Real planes would have been a potential liability for the perps on 911. It was easier to control the outcome of the event with much less risk by using the media to broadcast fake imagery. Real jets might miss their targets, get shot down, suffer pilot or computer errors, destroy or prematurely detonate any explosives, passengers could have overtaken the hijackers, and/or the plane might not inflict enough perceived damage to make a collapse believable.
A single fact which cannot be refuted is that a hollow aluminum plane (especially fragile wings) cannot slice through steel beams and concrete without any damage to the plane. News footage showing an airliner gliding into a Tower without any resistance is a cartoon. Aluminum planes are not built for impact and crumple immediately upon contact with solid objects; even a small bird can rip through a jet’s wing.
Furthermore, a large speeding jet’s vortex trails behind it creating a highly active atmosphere which follows in its path. Had a real plane impacted a WTC Tower, real film footage would have recorded the airliner’s vortex interacting with and violently dissipating the smoke from the alleged crash and the adjacent North Tower. No vortex literally means no planes on 911 (TV fakery).
During the South Tower “impact”, fake TV footage shows a WTC Tower sealing itself around the plane during the alleged penetration. Still another too incredible to believe anomaly is the width of the plane’s purported gash didn't match the width of a Boeing 757’s wing span. Another widely publicized video shot by Scott Myers shows the forward fuselage of the “jet” exiting the South Tower, though other shots later reveal no exit hole.
To consider the media footage showing a plane slicing thru steel and concrete as reality is ludicrous. There were no planes; only spoofed images, manipulated witnesses and falsified evidence. America please wake up; the media was a complicit partner that was in on the crime from the beginning. In fact, the TV psyop 911 couldn't have been pulled off without the mass media’s assistance.
Actually “no planes on 911? is the only explanation that makes any sense. There are far to many disturbing questions left unanswered which only TV fakery can address.
Besides all the other impossibilities I mentioned, why are there several “hijackers” still alive; some are even suing the US government to recover their reputation and good name.
Why have so many of the purported plane “victims” not been listed in the Social Security Death Index? …and their families not claimed the death $$benefits?
Why are there missing passenger lists and zero so-called Middle Eastern hijacker names on the flight manifest?
Why in the entire history of aviation has a plane never disappeared from a crash - yet on 911, four of them did in a single day? All plane parts are numbered; not one plane part from 911 has been identified by its number.
How could supposedly inexperienced “pilots” who couldn't even fly a Cessna…
* threaten and subdue everyone on board
* break into the locked cockpits w/ their hands
* kill all the pilots and copilots
…then navigate a large Boeing jetliner above the clouds all over several states without airport tower assistance, with nav systems & radios turned off, and fly with pinpoint accuracy into a building that they couldn't even see?
Not to mention that a Boeing 757 can't fly at 500+ MPH at sea level - the air is too thick. Call Boeing; even they admit that - and they have been recorded in phone conversations recently.
Exposing “no planes on 911? is probably the most important story to people beyond chemtrails, depleted uranium poisoning and nanotech genocide.
Americans are TV hypnotized, drugged up, dumbed down and so utterly dependent that in general they are incapable and disinterested in discovering how the media is adversely affecting their lives.
No planes on 911 and deception by the media is the Holy Grail of 911. It marks the beginning of an Orwellian double-speak mind-set which is now accepted as normal by the populace.
No-planes on 911 is highly important as it exposes the real perps behind this mass murder and offers justice to the thousands of people killed that day.
Without the covert deception by the media in collusion with the enemy in control of America’s military intelligence, 911 could not have happened.
The media was directly involved in 911 and together with a criminal government has helped diminish Americans’ freedoms and launch unending wars against innocent nations.
# # #
nootpad>
|
|
