((i))
 start >>

Languages:
english

Search:

with images
with audio
with video
Publish >>

Feature
archive >>
 


Newswire
archive >>
 

Topics:

mission statement >>   moderation >>   support >>   mailing lists >>   how to participate >>

Nazi’s Plans Ruined by Anti-Racists

frank nowarczyck, 04.06.2006 13:17


In the past week a neo-nazi group known as White Revolution has been kicked out of meetings, was forced to change locations and eventually they had to go into hiding due to the work of Wisconsin Anti-Fascists.



Weeks ago Wisconsin Anti-Racists caught wind of a white supremacist group known as White Revolution (WR) planning a networking picnic outside of Milwaukee. Quickly, several activists created false e-mails and subscribed to their e-mail list. The exact plans and locations of WR were easily found out and planning began to disrupt them at every turn.

The nazis sent a bumbling idiot to the first meeting of Anti-Racists. The man was quickly identified by being so frightened that he spilt his coffee all over himself. He was kicked out of our meeting and none of our plans were revealed. We did, however get his name, personal phone number and e-mail address. The next day the nazis sent out an e-mail showing exactly how scared they were of our anti-fascist efforts. They promptly canceled their planned leafleting of a Milwaukee neighborhood because they could not guarantee the safety of those involved and they moved the location of the picnic fearing a confrontation with Milwaukee Anti-Racist Action.

A very successful meeting was then held in Madison to continue our planning. This meeting signaled a new age of togetherness within Wisconsin’s radical groups that posses not only a threat to White Revolution, but all racists in this state. After White Revolution’s laughable attempt at infiltrating the Milwaukee meeting they decided to stay at home on their fat asses for this one, allowing us to very easily make our plans.

One final meeting was held in Milwaukee and WR mobilized a fat old man and an awkward kid to come. While they tried (without guile) to take our pictures we just moved our meeting downstairs and they tucked their tails between their legs and ran from the place. At that meeting it was decided exactly what we could do on June 3rd.

On Saturday, June 3rd, a group composed of different ages, genders and races mobilized to destabilize what the location that WR decided to use as their “security checkpoint.” Though the “mauling of epic proportions” that WR promised if we dare oppose them never came (probably because WR members were hiding behind police) we did get pictures of racist scum and their license plates so that we can fully identify them.

These actions were a complete success for Wisconsin’s Anti-Racist community. We now have WR’s complete e-mail list, pictures of confirmed racists, and a way to completely identify by name and address who these people are. In contrast WR’s own plans were completely ruined. Even before Saturday we made them cancel some of their plans and move the location of their event to a place where they had to hide behind cops and biker-gangs because they were afraid of a confrontation with us. On Saturday due to bad planning on their part they outed a good chunk of their group so that they could be identified and they made it very easy to neutralize any effective “security checkpoint.”

I want to close this article in a seemingly odd way, I want to thank the organizers of WI-WR (Stephen Chadwick and Chris Quimby), WR in general and that inbred-hick from Arkansas, Billy Roper. You people have done more for the Anti-Racist movement in Wisconsin than I ever could. Because of you, radical movements from all over this region have come together and Milwaukee Anti-Racist Action has awoken from it’s hibernation. Because of this, successful bonds have been made, and we will counter you at every move you make. See you in the streets





  Download this article in pdf format >>
  Add this article to your pdf newsletter selection >>
  Checkout and Download your PDF-newsletter selection >>

  Email this article to someone >>

  Make a quick comment on this article >>

congrats
04.06.2006 - 14:06
three cheers for milwaukee and madison
a herd of kittens>


Oh, it was not
05.06.2006 - 22:56
Oh no, everything went well. No bloodshed, no arrests.
i know that everyone in the WR-WI camp had a good time. From what I was told?
All the protestors got to feel good about them selves also.
Looking forward to the next round.
It'll be bloody fun for everyone.
I wasn't able to attend either sides activities. Maybe next time?
Matt Köhler>


alright
05.06.2006 - 22:57
good job, let's keep it going and continue to do more anti-racist work. anything planned?
cooder>


.
06.06.2006 - 15:03
"They promptly canceled their planned leafleting of a Milwaukee neighborhood because they could not guarantee the safety of those involved and they moved the location of the picnic fearing a confrontation with Milwaukee Anti-Racist Action."

"We now have WR’s complete e-mail list, pictures of confirmed racists, and a way to completely identify by name and address who these people are."
kilgore trout>


how about
07.06.2006 - 14:16
how about posting the photos of the racists and license plates online?
what's it to you>


.
07.06.2006 - 14:43
Hopefully before any action is taken with that information (license plate numbers, names, addresses), a consensus will be reached among the Wisconsin Anti-Racists who were present that day about what to do with it.
kilgore trout>


Oh just post it
08.06.2006 - 01:58
Oh don't worry about us "racists". Just post the photos.
I mean come on what's going to happen? Hurt my feelings with harsh language?
Stop being so silly.
Matt Köhler>


Dear Nazi's
08.06.2006 - 03:04

Yeah.>


no.
08.06.2006 - 04:56
As one of the contributors to that list of information, I humbly ask whoever is in possession of it not to be goaded into posting it until consensus is reached on the matter. It's our intelligence and it would be silly to share it.
kilgore trout>


pic of same
08.06.2006 - 08:11

here's the pic uploaded to this server for "robust" and "redundant"

cheers,

marco


marco>


Too late anyway
08.06.2006 - 21:41
It's already too late to use that list of addresses. Most everyone has already changed up anyway. That is with the exception of those of us (like myself) that just don't care what info you have. We will never stop, never surrender, and never compromise.
Have fun.
Matt Köhler>


Weak
09.06.2006 - 17:24
I like your little,"see you in the streets" comment...you can count on it.

RETALIATOR SKINHEAD NATION
RSN-88>


How silly
10.06.2006 - 03:04
Come on guys. You all can get a better picture of Hitler than that. Now you're just embarrassing your selves. Double so when we all know that Uncle Adolph's body was never found. So they don't know how he died. Though I will say that as a Nazi I know that he is dead. He failed Germany, and paid the price with his life.
So please, stop making your selves look so "low rent" I have confidence that at least a couple of you all have enough brain cells left to put a better photo up.
Matt Köhler>


come on nazis.....
10.06.2006 - 17:41
hey retaliators,
i said see you on the streets, not in the jail showers when you drop the soap, so obviously i wasn't talking to you.

and matt, you know hitler was an ugly bastard just like all of you white trash nazi types.

look guys, your kind of violent ignorance is losing it's hold on the world because of commited people like us. we will continue to counter you at every move until you crawl back under the rock you so recently came from.
frank nowarcyck>


wow
10.06.2006 - 18:02
Well, we'll retain the intelligence regardless. I find it hard to believe that after your picnic, every Nazi in Milwaukee felt compelled to change his automobile license information and place of residence.

It is funny to me (though not surprising) that your best comeback to that Hitler picture is "Get a better picture". It's inspiring to see that we've made you give up that whole "Jews are evil" thing in favor of something a bit more reasonable.
kilgore trout>


Once again, stop it
10.06.2006 - 20:19
Oh stop it. You're going to hurt my feeling. Hitler was so ugly that all the German people followed him. As for myself though? Hel, I would have been the first one to tell you that I'm ugly. It's part of my charm. LMAO

If you were going to "stop us at every turn"? Where were you when I was holding cook-outs at my house in Madison? You all are just media whores. You know it, and I know it. So stop trying to make "love connections" and go about your business.
And for the love of all that's holy get some better graphics.
Matt Köhler>


no honesty among mongrels
11.06.2006 - 01:00
Where are the pictures so boldly declared you had taken? What about the names pulled from the plate numbers? All talk and no action weak mongrels. If you have the ammunition, pull the trigger. Lies and more lies from ant-fa, ara and Sharp faggots.
trendkill>


hey folks
11.06.2006 - 16:08
actually mister kohler, you don't live in madison. if i remember right you were so frightened by anything resembling a city that you packed up and moved to the burbs. media whores? i would like nothing better than to find you in a dark alley with no witnesses. i could care less about the media, my main concern is making suure you remain ineffective.

to you mister trendkill, the pictures will be posted soon, to be honest we just have yet to get together and talk about what to do with them. i appologize for our lack of quickness, just for you we'll get on with that soon. also, you can continue to call us mongrels all you want, personally i prefer race traitor but to each his own. those words, don't phase any of us. as for us being faggots, maybe some folks there that day were so i'm not going to cry about that either.

you guys can act tough all you would like but we all know that you are afraid. afraid of the city, afraid of anything non-white, and afraid of us. milwaukee's ara will make sure that you remain that way because you bastards should be scared.
frank nowarcyck>


hahaha
12.06.2006 - 15:40
Calling an anarchist antifa contingent a bunch of media whores is a stupid thing to say. You are stupid. Because you know, anarchists have SUCH a long history of just loving the corporate media to pieces. We hate independent media. Hate it hate it hate it.

Listen, we have nothing to prove to you, and I'm not going to share any of the intelligence we gathered that day with you, photographs included. That would be a ridiculously stupid move, and I'm nothing like you, so I won't do stupid things.



kilgore trout>


.oh, and...
12.06.2006 - 15:43
You guys seem to really enjoy picnics and cookouts. It's funny (though not surprising) that the people so in favor of perpetuating white privilege are so in favor of consuming and making themselves fatter.
kilgore trout>


NAzi shindig.
12.06.2006 - 23:55
Have you guys heard about the Nazi-Hilter monument in Elkhorn coming up?

 http://www.theweekextra.com/news/hitler061106/index.html
Mike H.>
e-mail:: mhagainstfascism@yahoo.com


Eyes shut to truth
13.06.2006 - 21:54
Living in one of the most segregated cities in the country I assume you rarley venture out alone into dark parts of town. It is easy to embrace all people and see no differences when you only have 2 black kids in a high school of 2000 in a suburb of Milwaukee like Waukesha or Hartland. The blacks are seen as a novelty and surrounded by whites so as to be kept in check lest become outcasts. Now, jump over to the ghetto in downtown Milwaukee and you find the niggers; crack heads, gang bangers, and useless pieces of shit. Sad thing for you all still stuck there, is that they are spreading out more and more. By the time I left, they had to close Northridge mall because of the nigger crime scaring away paying customers and Grand Avenue was all but a shell of whow it was when it opened. Look at Milwaukee crime statistics, you find a nice pattern of low life blacks attacking whites who make up the productive citizenry.Why is the average black IQ lower than whites? Why do FBI crime statistics prove year in and year out that crimes are committed by blacks on other blacks or on whites by a vastly greater multiple than whites on either race? You can't take a savage out of the jungle and expect him to become a follower of ideas that are genetically foreign.
trendkill>


trendkill, you stupid bastard.
13.06.2006 - 22:24
many of us live in those "dark neighborhoods" with no problem. you obviously would have a problem due to your racist beliefs and hopefully you'd get the crap kicked out of you.

personaly i grew up in a neighborhood that housed many different people of many different colors. because of this i'm not scared when a non-white person walks by me or my house and i am better off for it.

crime is a symptom of poverty and poverty is a symptom of institutionalized class hierarchies of which all races are suffering from. you are serving these hierarchies and making sure that they keep a strangle-hold on the poor.

you keep spouting your racist propaganda that has no real thought behind it and refuses to look any deeper than surface level.

p.s. ideas are not genetic. neither is ignorance, so please cure both of these things in yourself. until you do i will be against you.
frank nowarcyck>


for the record, trendkill
14.06.2006 - 15:41
It was nothing less than supremely awesome when northridge mall closed. That it now sits a derelict, empty carapace is testament to the emblematic uselessness and destructiveness of our consumer culture. The death of a shopping mall should be celebrated by all those who care for the health of this planet, and of ourselves. One down, thousands more to go.

Oh fuck, what am I saying?! Without the mall, where can I go to get my daily fill of cinnabons, orange julius' and sbarro pizza, before buying some napoleon dynamite t-shirts from spencer gifts and multi-use, burlwood handled, battery charged popcorn fork/taser (with a handy remote control, in case it gets lost) from the sharper image??
aubrac>


truth is not racist
16.06.2006 - 00:23
For the record, I do not advocate blind consumerism driven by a media that is poisining America's youth. The point was, that the mall was shut down by activities of derelict, uneducated, worthless black kids/adults who can not understand the responsobility of being part of a civilized society. They can not comprehend civic duty, they only understand a gang mentality because their culture is that of non-evolving tribalism. MTV and crass commercialism ruin black kids as well as white kids by impregnating impresionable minds that it is ok to be stupid, that hard work and intelligence are not virtues, that integrity and honor do not matter. The fact that many of you may have grown up in "dark" parts of town does not change factual statistics that prove crime rates, IQ differences, higher levels of aids, greater numbers of single parents, etc.,etc..are indicative of blacks. Truth is not racist, only honest. Why do you think African continent is near ruin now? The blacks can not run a city or a country without the whites who actually built the cities and infrstructures. Look at Zimbabwe, South Africa, etc...The expelled white farmers and now they face food shortages because the blacks they handed the farms over to just looted and never worked the farms. The boers built the sub continent and all of the economic prosperity it enjoyed under their rule. Blacks in Africa had no forms of government, no industry, no rule of law, nothing. Just nomadic waring tribes while the whites exponentialy evolved in discovery, self awarness, invention, and culture. Blacks are different genetically and that is fact; ideas that are foreign genetically are those that do not occur naturally. Blacks are not hard wired for the same culture that whites are genetically. If they were, sub-Africa would have been on par with rest of the white world. An understanding of race does not mean that you can not respect another because of race as it may have no bearing on their honesty or integrity or values. The facts are statements that apply to the general populace of the black race; does not mean that there are not smart, honest, hard working blacks.
trendkill>


your "truth" is not honest, just skewed
16.06.2006 - 21:08
if you care to continue this debate please address the issues that have been raised to counter your arguements instead of stating new examples for the exact same point.

i brought up earlier the connection between economic class and crime and because you have no easy statistics to counter this arguement you chose to ignore it. these "facts" that you continue to try and hammer into everyone do not approach problems with a wholistic worldview. the truth is that in given groups of the same socio-economic status but different races crime statistic are about equal. of course racists like yourself are either to dumb or too blinded to be expected to look at the reality of the situation.

if you have decided what you believe and then look for statistic to prove what you already think it will always be easy. for instance if i wanted to prove that white women are the biggest drain on this society, i would only need to look at welfare roles and i would see that white single mother recieve most of that money. of course this would not be the complete truth. it ignores the fact that it is harder for women to get (and keep) jobs when they have to raise children. ignoring this fact changes the entire way this statement is percieved.

in much the same way you cite africa as an example of the inferiority of black people. but you ignore the huge impact of slavery, resource theft and the continued influence of transnational debt. basically you have (and most likely always will) ignore the atrocities that white have comitted against all people of color and you ignore the institutionalized racism that makes the first world thrive while the rest of the world suffers.
frank nowarcyck>


you cant skewer fact
17.06.2006 - 02:09
You never commented on the first issues I raised, you just rambled on about poverty. What about sub-Africa when whites first arrived? What about now that there are no whites in power, why are the nations now crumbling? Why are black run cities the worst in America? Why do blacks have a higher dropout rate? Why do black have extremely higher percantages of AIDS cases? Why do blacks need affirmative action? Reading and learning is not a rich person only luxury. Look at Texas, the top 10% of all high school graduates are accepted at UT without question. How many are black? Very few because of black culture; what they watch, what they listen to, who there parents are, etc...It does not help that almost 70 percent of black children are born to single mothers. Many American youths overcome poverty to become productive members of society. The facts are that blacks have lower IQs without fail in all sectors of society. On average, African-Americans score 7 to 15 points lower than European-Americans on IQ tests. Crime rates are the same proportion all across America; blacks committ crime on a higher level and against blacks and whites at multiples of white offense rates. Black males make up only about 6% of the US population, they commit over half of all violent crimes and over 43% of all rapes. Considering that the population of whites is far greater than blacks, the total number of welfare recipients that are white is higher. The point is that Blacks comprise only 12 percent of the nation, but, they comprise 37 percent of the welfare rolls. Whites, a vast majority comprise 38 percent which is barley above blacks. Not racist, just truth you blind fuck. Let's consider the black man and his crimes against whites because you say white people are the problem:
Blacks murder whites at 18 times the rate whites murder blacks.
In the last 30 years, blacks committed 170 million violent and non-violent crimes against whites.
Blacks under 18 are more than 12 times more likely to be arrested for murder than whites under 18.
About 90% of the victims of interracial crimes are white.
Blacks commit 7.5 times more violent interracial crimes than whites, although whites outnumber blacks by 7 to 1.
On a per capita basis, blacks commit 50 times more violent crime than whites.
Black neighborhoods are 35 times more violent than white neighborhoods.
Of the 27 million nonviolent robberies, 31% (8.4 million) were committed by blacks against whites. Less than 2% were committed by whites against blacks.
Of the 6.6 million violent crimes, 20% (1.3 million) were interracial.
Of the the 1.3 million interracial violent crimes, 90% (1.17 million) are black against white.
Again open your eyes you stupid fuck. poverty is not an invention of the white man. Poverty is culture related, and when you have a culture of blacks that have more children without parents, listen to rap music that propagates drugs and violence, have no or few positive role models except rapers and athletes, refuse free education and blame whitey for their problems, you end up with worthless monkeys running the streets like in New Orleans. Just a side note, when a sunami struck the orient months after the New Orleans hurricanes, over 200,000 people were displaced with no murders or looting. How? No niggers! What did the niggers from New Orleans buy with the FEMA cards? Jewelry, booze, strip club bar bills, etc....Fuck you and your faggot pussy crying about the poor blacks. Blacks in Africa sold them to the Spanish Jews who owned the boats that took them to Brazil and the islands south of Florida. Blacks sold by blacks. Fuck off.
trendkill>


ok trendkill, lets get this over with.
17.06.2006 - 21:39
ok budy, here we go. in this comment i will address everything that you said in you last comment, and in exchange i would like you to try your hardest to address issues that i raised such as poverty's effect on elevated crime statistics. if you refuse to address specifically issues that i raise please stop wasting space on this server.

sub-saharan africa before whites arrived was a diverse land of a multitude of indigenous cultures. these's culture's warfare was practically non-lethal, all of their member were well fed, and women were treated as equals. the whites brought with them their system of "civilization" and with it came oppression, murder and environmental degredation. so given these facts i fail to see anypoint that you are attempting to make.

now that the whites have "left power" the people of africa must confront a world that is still white controled and simultaniously search for an identity that has been ripped away from them. for instance, they must deal with loans from the imf/world bank that forces them to sell their resources to first world nations (read: white dominated nations). in addition to this new sectarian divides (mostly through western religion but also ethnicities that whites turned against eachother so that they would be easier to control) that keeps these countries in turmoil.

black run cities the worst in the country? it's kind of hard to respond to this without an example of a well run city, since most cities in this country are going broke because white people are scared of black people and move to the burbs. most of this white flight happened under white administrations too so i am still failing to see your point.

the dropout rate for blacks is higher a couple of reason. one of which is that the american school system fails it's responsibilities in urban school districts (where most blacks in america are). this is true across the board for all races. city schools are under funded, under staffed and over crowded. if you throw into this mix the fact that schools basically teach for whites through history that glorifies the europeans and ignores atrocities commited against the indigenous. and before you go throwing out black history month, let me remind you that one month of hastily put together lesson plans does not nearly make up for the rest of the year being told from a white perspective.

as for AIDs this is a case of lack of education, lack of health care and lack of money to get either of the first two.

i think your UT point isn't so much a new point as it is an example of your education issue, but since i'm originally from texas i feel the need to comment anyway. for one, i've never heard of that 10% rule (not saying it doesn't exist) so if i, a white kid haven't heard of it what chance do you think that a black kid would hear of it and strive towards it? moreover that example does not say that these kids have their college paid for and many black are in low economic brackets. why apply if you can't pay for it?

you start discussing culture in the middle of your comment which i thought was odd if you are attempting to establish racial inferiority. i will not argue with you that alot of things in this culture need to be changed because they make it harder for all human beings to reach their full potential. i will however point out that many cultural problems within black communities come out of attempting to gain power in a system built to keep it from them. this can be changed and because it can be changed it does not help your arguement at all that blacks are bad people.

youths overcoming poverty? are you really trying use the old pull yourself up by your bootstraps statement? that's laughable. it has been shown time and time again that both wealth and power (in as much as we pretend they are seperate) stay concentrated with those that already have them.

as for your IQ tests thought, the brookings institute realeased a study not to long ago dealing with it. i could never argue it as well as they have so here you go, educate yourself outside of nazi propaganda ( http://brookings.nap.edu/books/0815746091/html/1.html).

i'm going to go after your entire crime rant at once so if i miss something feel free to point it out and i will quickly refute it. first of i would like to point out that all of your statistics are from reported or convicted crimes. it has been shown time and time again that our criminal justice system is stacked against people of color. moreover i believe that i have already stated that crime is more prevalent in poorer communities and institutionalized racism means that there are more poor people of color by percentage than whites. this is one of my arguements you have chosen to ignore probably because you can't find any statistics to back you up on your nazi websites.

let's talk about welfare, and with that lets talk about ingrained racism in this culture. it is harder for people of color to get jobs. as much as you and your ilk like to talk about affirmative action, this only applys when some one can prove racial discrimination in hiring practices. in the job that i have currently all of the employees are white. our customer base and the people that apply for jobs here are roughly fifty percent people of color. now the job is not all that demanding of skills so there is no reason that education level should figuer in. all and all applicants are roughly equal in ability. my boss (a white dude) however, just never seems to be interested in black applicants. he's not an overt racist but the cultural racism surrounding him shows here. this is but one example and there are many more that prove how hard it is to get a job and be non-white. thus welfare is the product of rascist like you and you still want to complain about it. bastard.

we've already talked about crime and though you may feel the need to restate points again and again in a type of racist mantra, i don't.

i agree that poverty is culture realated and as an anarchist i'm struggling against many components of this culture including you closed minded nazi skum bags.

in closing, did you really call me a female genital that is attracted to men (faggot pussy)? that's kind of funny. if you are trying to say that anti-racists are wimps or something like that feel free to come and find me and others and see where that gets you. i hope you have health care.
frank nowarcyck>


sorry about the typos
18.06.2006 - 12:16
sorry about all the typos, i was at work and therefore was destracted and didn't have time to proof read.
frank nowarcyck>


vague generalizations
20.06.2006 - 17:47
Frank, I do not have the time at this moment to repsond to your last message, but will this evening. On a quick note, the misdeeds of the IMF and World Bank are not the issue as I actually agree with you on that point and consider the Dems and Neo-cons who support this form of eternal serfdom of entire countries traitors. Realise that what said poloticians are doing now is devalueing the American dollar so they can insert a foreign currency, probably in the form of a North American dollar like Europes Euro. The Federal Reserve already has the American currency system in private hands and owned by the large banks. Once the takeover is complete, the powerbrokers who control the IMF, World Bank, and all central banks of countries like ours will be in total power of money. You will more than likely agree that the reason JFK was killed was because he put us back on the silver standard and started issueing real American dollars and not fed notes. All of these things still have nothing to do with the difference between the races, and as I stated in an earlier post, there are many smart, honest, hard working black people. I speak of statistics and general broad terms of the makeup of large sectors of groups. By the way, do you know who controls most of the international banks? I will give you a hint, it is not the Arabs as they do not believe in interest. Who are the money lenders?
trendkill>


theft of movements
21.06.2006 - 20:15
your views on the imf and world bank don't really go along with your racist views (being that world trade benefits whites over poor people of color) they do however show that because racists have a hard time recruiting on pure racism they attempt to hijack movements of international solidarity. it is for this same reason that many of your ilk try to infiltrate the palistinian liberation movement.

no one is fooled by this tactic, maybe you should go back to the tried and true cross burning. while horrible at least that was honest. it also attracted your real base (inbred hicks). people in the global justice movement realize that fighting against world trade is fighting for our class and that to win for our class we have to unite with all races. you mistakenly have decided that to beter yourself you have to seperate from people and scapegoat people of color. this only serves the status quo, which is why real revolutionaries the world over have and will continue to fight you.
frank nowarcyck>


dumbfuck revealed as armchair anarchist...lol
22.06.2006 - 22:44
Wow. I never could have thought that you are this stupid. The World Bank and IMF are in my favor? By being part of the same one-world government clique that are currently dismantling the USA and trying o merge it with Mexico and Canada? The same people that run the Federal Reserve which holds a grip on Americas economy by passing fiat currency with no real value and then taxes our people in the form of interest on our own currency? The same people who make it a crime in Europe to question the holocaust. How is that in a white nationalists interest? Do you even know what a nationalist is and what we stand for you moron?!?!? Who runs the World Bank you illiterate faggot? Wolfowitz! Who ran the Federal Reserve? Greenspan! Who lobbies the government to outlaw speaking out against israel? The ADL! Jews you stupid fuck! You are too god damn stupid to figure out why a Nationalst would not like the World Bank when the founders of our country spoke out against a central banking system? The same founders who spoke out against the jewish problem!! You didnt know that?!?! Read you dumbfuck, you just spout communist rhetoric in the guise of anarchism. What a tool. Are you 18 years old still flying an anarchist banner? You are one stupid fuck and you don't even know how stupid you really sound. I have thrown nothing but facts at you and your retort is that it is because of poverty and the white mans fault. Did you see that they just realese the latest high school graduation figures? Guess who is last.....Detroit, what a surprise!!! Detroit is 81% black and guess what....the graduation rate is about 20%!!! A mere coincidence? What are the other lowest cities....Milwaukee, Cleveland and New York. All cities with huge nigger populations. The highest rate of graduation you ask....Fairfax, VA which is 89% white!! Wow! Another coincidence you will say becuase I am sure you think all those cities are just crammed with those poor helpless black folk. Now, lets look at your previous post where you use generalizations about Africa and poverty. Africa before whites arrived was a waring continent that had tribes of basically stone age level blacks that invented nothing...no boats, no law, no wheel, nothing the rest of the modern world implemented as tools as of an evolving society. The BLACK tribes practiced slavery and SOLD OTHER BLACKS to the spanish jews who carted them to Brazil and the tropics to be sold. Now that they have murdered the white Boers and stolen the farms and ruined the cities infrastructures, the cities are crumbling. It has nothing to do with loans from the World Bank or the IMF, it has to do with the fact that the niggers who pillaged the farms DO NOT WORK THEM, THEY JUST STOle THE GOODS AND RAN. Africa now faces food shortages because blacks wont run farms they stole!!!!South Africa is rotting from inside because of infighting and the blacks inability to run daily commerce. It has ZERO to do with loans from banks you stupid fuck!!! Because white people flee from crime commiting niggers has no bearing on the way cities are run by blacks you moron fuck. The whitest cities in this country have the highest rates of education and the lowest rates of crime. The cities with black leaders are the worst, plain and simple!! That is a fact, they are in charge and they run cities into the ground! By the way, blacks fail in school because of their culture. The schools teach history that is consumed with white characters because it was whites who built the modern world dumb fuck. We were building cities, exploring the globe, creating mathmatics and philosophy, creating great societies and rule of law and government while blacks were dancing around a hut in Africa. In Africa they still have witch doctors who tell blacks to rape babies to get rid of aids, they still perform black magic and kill children to gain power; leaders of black nations do this shit...open a paper you stupid faggot fuck! You can find papers from Eurpoe, Russia, and Africa itself that speak of daily horror and decaying cities. And by the way, where did you live in Texas? There is no teenager in high school down here who does not know about the 10% rule. "Top 10 is certainly merit-based. It is also a better determinant than SAT scores of a student's potential success in college. According to a study conducted by the UT admissions office, the students getting in under top 10 earn higher GPAs and exhibit higher retention rates than other students. In addition, because the SAT is socio-economically biased, the top-10 plan, which disregards SAT scores, promotes greater equality in the assessment of high school applicants." You were not aware of a law that is an integral part of Texas culture? One touted as bias free? Guess what? Blacks are still at the bottom because they refuse to learn. Do not cry poor you stupid fuck; state school fees apply and the tuition is about $1500. Even a nigger dishwasher can afford that much to insure his childs future right? Afirmative Action allows blacks with low scores that would not normally meet standards into our colleges. That makes them wards of the state because it indicates an inability to function on the same level as white people and asian people. Answer back after you gain an education and learn how to read boy!!
trendkill>


Take out the trash
23.06.2006 - 03:10
Learn to use paragraphs and read a book, you dumb motherfucker. Frank, keep up the good work!
Arditi del Popolo>


racist revealed with no reading comprehension
23.06.2006 - 20:49
first off how was i revealed as an armchair anarchist? usually that term applies to people who only talk i do alot more than that.

i never said that the imf/world bank works in your interest specifically, i said it benefits whites over people of color. this, of course, does not mean all whites. working class people the world over are hurt by these organizations (along with globalized trade in general) this includes all races. what it does mean is that it benefits upper classes which are predominately white. by the way, you can attempt to make the asserstion that jews run these institutions but white christian types appoint them so who is really in charge?

i don't spout communist rhetoric, so maybe it's you that should read. something that doesn't come from a nazi propagandist perhaps? and actually no, i'm not an 18 year old carrying an anarchist banner, i'm over 18 carrying an anarchist baseball bat. would you like to see it up close?

i guess we're going coming to an impass as to poverty versus race but i would like to point out that whites in the lower socioeconomic bracket have extremely low graduation rates as well. just look at impoverished appalachia, a white area with low test scores and graduation rates.

on to africa once again. i never denied that there was war before whites came. i did however say that that war was practically non-lethal with deaths being the exception rather than the norm. the non-invention of the wheel is used often as a way to show superiority of whites over other people but the wheel was only invented in europe because of the animals native to that area. these animals (horses, oxes and such) lent themselves to this kind of tool. in africa and the americas these animals were not around and therefore there was no need for a wheel. as to no boats (which i'm sure you mean ships because there were in fact many small boats on the coast of that continent) there is no need for the invention of this if you do not want to conquer another area. did you really say that laws did not exist on that continent? how about hamarabi's code? this was the very first written code of laws in the world. and yes there was slavery (much like there was in rome) but this kind of slavery was not the eternal servatude type and slaves actually had a means of upward mobility in the societies.

now onto current africa. are you really trying to say that the reason people are starving in africa is because they refuse to feed themselves? are you that ignorant? most arable land the world over goes to producing cash crops for the first world and not into producing food for the country. unfortunately most african nations came into their own (throwing off the shackles of imperial colonialism) just in time to be exploited by newly forming global capitalism (taking on the shackles of economic colonialism).

actually whites fleeing the cities has alot to do with how the cities are run. it's called tax base. if your tax base is poor then your city will be poor. it's that simple. you can have the best ideas in the entire world but without the cash to put them in place in this system they will never come to fruition. i'm sure even you can see that.

kill babies to gain power? really? is that true? kind of like when an american cruise missle hit a hospital? or maybe jewish, gypsy and other undirirable kids going to gas chambers under hitler. if africans kill babies for power they sure have been given a wonderful example of how that could work by whites.

i lived in houston, went to westbury high and bellaire high (on the southwest side). and i'm not so sure that's an integral part of texas culture. are you from there? by the way, right now i'm having an awful hard time paying my $1000 tuition and my bills so what was your point again?

did you really call me illiterate? i'm pretty sure i've been reading and following your hate rant even with all of the fucks you throw in. in addition i have been responding in a way that makes since and is easy to read using proper flow and paragraph breaks. you however have not been doing these things. please attempt to write well thought out and well structured responces not your rants that jump from one subject to another and then back again.
frank nowarcyck>


woops
24.06.2006 - 13:42
alright, it occurred to me that hamarabi's code isn't the best example to use here (even though hamarabi was black) being that babylon wasn't in africa.

luckily, there are many examples to choose from so i'll give you another. timbuktu comes to mind. maybe you've heard of it, or maybe not being that you seem not to know much of anything about precolonized africa. well it was a huge city that was known for it's educating people from around the world (including white folk from europe). it had not only an advanced code of law but a university and a grand library, something almost unheard of in europe at the time.

on a seperate note, i'm not so sure why you want to use civilization as a measure of people. i mean look at european history, before the romans conquered the continent most people lived very similarly to the people in africa. there were the germanic hordes (commonly refered to as barbarians) which were a nomadic uncivililized fighting group. there were the celts and the druids in what is now the uk, these people were basically stone age earth worshippers. remember that next time you talk about how "civilized" whites are.
frank nowarcyck>


what a tool
25.06.2006 - 12:18
You can't even spell Haamurabi correctly. "King Hammurabi has become most famous for his Code of Laws, dating from 1750 BC, which is widely but incorrectly held to be the first written legal code in the world (it was the second, the first being the code drawn up by the earlier White Sumerians). Hammurabi's Code of Law was engraved in stone and set up in the great cities of the region - to this day the Code is regarded as the father of the all legal codes of the world.

While some of the laws themselves seem harsh to the modern mind (death for being unable to repay debt, for example) nonetheless the wording of the prologue to Hammurabi's Law Code provides a fascinating glimpse into the conflict between the Semitic and Indo-European populations in the region.

In the prologue, Hammurabi announces that he has come to "rule the black haired people"; he is also referred to as "the White King" and the "White Potent", obviously in reference to his coloring.

The original introduction on the Hammurabi Code, which was engraved in stone and is still existent, reads as follows :

"Hammurabi, the exalted prince, who feared God, to bring about the rule of righteousness in the land, to destroy the wicked and the evil-doers; so that the strong should not harm the weak; so that I should rule over the black-headed people like Shamash, and enlighten the land, to further the well-being of mankind..."

"Hammurabi, the prince, called of Bel am I, making riches and increase,...who enriched Ur;...the white king,...the mighty, who again laid the foundations of Sippara...the lord who granted new life to Uruk, who brought plenteous water to its inhabitants...the White, Potent, who penetrated the secret cave of the bandits ..." Maybe you think he was black because his laws were carved into a giant black stone tablet.

As far as Timbuktu is concerned : "Timbuktu was founded around 1100 C.E. as a camp for its proximity to the Niger River. Caravans quickly began to haul salt from mines in the Sahara Desert to trade for gold and slaves brought along the river from the south. By 1330, Timbuktu was part of the powerful Mali Empire, which controlled the lucrative gold-salt trade routes in the region. Two centuries later, Timbuktu reached its grandeur under the Songhay Empire, becoming a haven for scholars.


From the early part of the fourteenth century to the time of the Moroccan invasion in the late sixteenth century, the city of Timbuktu became an important intellectual and spiritual center of the Islamic world, attracting people from as far away as Saudi Arabia to study there. Great mosques, universities, schools, and libraries were built under the Mali and Songhay Empires, some of which still stand today." It was an Islamic center for teaching Arabs you dumbfuck. Again, not even in the sub-saharan Africa which we have been speaking of, but a part of northern Africa which was inhabited by Arabs such as Egyptians, Libyans, Morrocons, etc,etc...... And just so you know that there were no institutions of higher learning in black Africa, lets take a look at the earliest and where they were:

Al-Azhar University, Cairo,Egypt, founded in 988
University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy, founded in 1088
University of Paris, Paris, France, founded c. 1150 (now split between several autonomous universities)
University of Oxford, Oxford, England, founded before 1167
University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, founded c. 1209
University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain, founded in 1218
University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France, founded in 1220
University of Padua, Padua, Italy, founded in 1222
University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy, founded in 1224
University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France, founded in 1229
University of Siena, Siena, Italy, founded in 1240
University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal, founded in 1290 in Lisbon
Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain, founded in 1293 in Alcalá de Henares
University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain, founded in 1300
University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy, founded in 1303
University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy, founded in 1343
Charles University of Prague, Prague, Czech Republic, founded in 1348
University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy, founded in 1361
Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland, founded in 1364
University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, founded in 1365
University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary, founded in 1367
Ruprecht Karls University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany, founded in 1386
University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy, founded in 1391
University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany, founded in 1402
University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany, founded in 1409
University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, Scotland, founded in 1412
University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany, founded in 1419
Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, founded in 1425, now split between the French-speaking Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve and the Dutch-speaking Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, still at Leuven
University of Poitiers, Poitiers, France, founded in 1431
University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, founded in 1451
University of Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey, founded in 1453
Ernst Moritz Arndt University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany, founded in 1456
Albert Ludwigs University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany, founded in 1457
Basel University, Basel, Switzerland, founded in 1460
Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden, founded in 1477
Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany, founded in 1477
University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, founded in 1479
University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, founded in 1494
University of Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain, founded in 1495


Black Africa is in the hands of blacks now and is in worse condition for that reason as more black leaders are now in power. "Ignoring the heinous tyranny in black Africa passively condones black African tyranny as long as the tyrants are black. This insidious form of racism suggests that white rulers in Africa must be held accountable to a higher moral standard than black leaders face. Africans vehemently object to this treacherous double standard. To their dead compatriots, the color of the hand that killed them made little difference. Vehement denunciation of apartheid without a parallel condemnation of tyranny in black Africa serves only to perpetuate the myth of black inferiority and to accentuate the suffering of all black Africans.

What many black African leaders do to their people has for years aided and abetted apartheid. Although apartheid is an institutionalized form of racism, when the issue is stripped of its emotional rhetoric there is really little difference between that system and black tyranny in independent Africa. The instruments of oppression are identical virtually everywhere on the African continent. Tyranny is tyranny, regardless of the race of the tyrant. Black-on- black tyranny is as ethically abhorrent as white-on-black oppression."

Black tyrants control Africa as commerce and civil law evaporate. The tyrant employs a variety of tactics to decimate opposition to his rule: co-optation, bribery, infiltration, intimidation, and "divide and conquer." Opposition leaders compound their weakness by their constant bickering. Out of frustration, a rebel group emerges from the excluded class and mounts a guerrilla campaign to oust the despot and his cohorts from power, or to secede, as in the Biafran secession in 1967. In the course of the insurgency, the guerrilla movement splits into several factions, often along tribal lines. If the campaign to overthrow the regime is unsuccessful, the war drags on for years, even decades, as in Angola, Mozambique, and Sudan. If the head of state is ousted or killed, a power vacuum emerges and factional leaders battle ferociously to fill the void, as in Somalia and Liberia.

As is was before the white man arrived in Africa to discover an ever-waring black populatin, it shall now ever be...The Boers built the modern ciies and farms in Africa and with colonization brought civilization. Balcks still can not operate together for the better good of their people. They expell the whites to claim the fortunes that white industry provides, but can not run the daily institutions that are in place to create the wealth. Left to their own devices, the black leaders in Africa are greedy, sadistic, and meglomaniacal. They care only about power and money. What a coincidence that the modern American black is much the same; they care only about appearances and not the substance, and care little for the good of the community.

I could go on and on but reciting the facts gets old....you obvioulsy still clutch on to a glimmering hope that all people are equal and that blacks should not be responsible for their own actions. You say it over and over again about Africa and blacks in America....it's not their fault. Grow up you dense fuck. I hope it made it easier for you to read since instead of countering points you spoke of papragraphs. The funniest thing is, is that you make all my points for me without realising it!!

You are obviously in college, you claim you pay your own tuition, and are apparenlty not wealthy. Why are you then not slinging crack on the corner or selling weed? Maybe you are, I don't know. Why ahve you not robbed a liquor store? What drives millions of non-rich whites to want to continue education and progress? Why can the black commuinty not do the same? The 10% rule in Texas, where I live, is a prisitine example of a non biased way into a top college. All blacks in Texas need to do is study and get good grades and they will be accepted automatically. Why don't they do it in greater numbers? If you say because of the white man you are so brainwashed you are beyond help. If you agree that blacks need special laws to get into other universities with lower test scores than you are a racist because you believe blacks are not as smart and need whiteys hand out to get into school. There are less black owned business' in America now than there were in the 1960's and it is because of the black culture. The current rap oriented, hand-out oriented, blame shifting culture that has been created by supposed leaders of the black people has crushed the very spirit they used to have 40 years ago and earlier. Want to read a good black leader? Check out Tony Brown, he is a smart dude that can help his people. He also has a show on PBS. You better start opening your eyes bud. When the niggers in this country really expand on their anti-white rhetoric and actions, do you really think they will spare you?



trendkill>


here we go again....
25.06.2006 - 15:44
man you chose to skip over why i'm an arm chair anarchist, that's too bad i was looking forward to it. i do want to congratulate you on finding out how to use paragraphs. in addition to that your rant style was toned down a bit, way to go.

for the sake of expediancy i'm gunna skip over the babylon discussion and ceed that you may be right. i'm not saying you are but i haven't looked up enough information to make an arguement one way or another.

on to timbuktu. first off this area is classically considered sub-saharan. (for a map showing sub-saharan africa check this out:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Sub-Saharan-Africa.png) second off i think that you misread your own source it said that "Timbuktu became an important intellectual and spiritual center of the Islamic world, attracting people from as far away as Saudi Arabia to study there." it did not say that arabs were teaching nor that they controlled the area. these were black muslims that were teaching many different people.

if this is not enough for you here are some other sub saharan african civilizations for you. Nubia, Axum, Wagadugu (Ghana), Nok, Kanem-Bornu, Benin and Great Zimbabwe. do some reading and check these out.

i'm not ignoring any tyranny. yes tyranny exists in africa. what i am saying is that this tyranny is not a product of an inferior race as you propose, but that it is a product of a global community that benefits from keeping certain groups impoverished. this can be easily illustrated by recent events in somalia with the U.S. backing warlords in mogadishu.

yet again you go back to saying that africa was a waring continent. this word usage in english does not accurately describe the type of warfare that happened in that continent. when we say war today we assume that many will die, this is not the case in most indigenous cultures includeing that of africa. their warfare (as i have said in previous posts that you have chosen to ignore because you cannot counter it) was practically non-lethal.

as for blacks in this country not caring about communities, most of the grassroots community based organizations in this country are put together by urban black folks and they are very successful. by contrast whites live in neighborhoods for years and never meet their neighbors some community. ha. granted these differences are cultural which brings me to my next point...

you continue to talk about culture as if it were genetically incoded in people. i make no appologies for culture in this world. there are many things that are messed up about the way we live nowadays but these are all things that can and must be changed. but by speaking of culture you do not further your arguements that some races are inferior. you would do well think about how to properly argue your point.

i have not resorted to crimes the likes of which because of the priveledge my skin affords me. it is easy for me to gain employment because i am white in a nation where whites control hiring and firing ractices. blacks do not have this same priveledge putting many in a situation of desperation. i don't think that blacks score lower on tests because of inferiority as you suggest but because this culture is stacked against them. as for black ownership of buisnesses being on the decline i think that it goes along with the rise of huge chain stores that are running many small buisnesses out of operation.

my last two points have been mostly counter points with only a brief mention of your lack of paragraph usage. you however have ignored thing you cannot find a way to explain away (for instance the lack of "civilization" in many whites). this as well as insults is a poor debate tactic and shows you inability to make well thought out arguements.
frank nowarcyck>


I was there...a good time had by all WR Volk
25.06.2006 - 22:16
Having been one of the Faithful White Nationalists in attendence at the White Revolution Picnic I can only laugh at the self-serving congratulations of "success" that a couple of pathetic aging hippies and thier group of confused adolescents wish to bestow upon themselves: you scum did nothing to ruin OUR day. Perhaps the disgusting grouping which was assembled at the "security check-point" (a ruse), having ingested too many hallucinogecics, considers a day spent wasted on drugs and pounding on painted five-gallon pails worthy of cheer. You sub-humans are entertaining, in a sideshow oddities fashion. By the way: do you people ever PROMOTE a defined program, or are you merely reactionairies looking for a life to define yourselves by. White by birth, Nationlist by CHOICE: I act proactively
The White Truth>


francis yockey on race
25.06.2006 - 22:24
The weakening of the will— Nietzsche called it “paralysis of will”— another symptom of dying out of
racial instincts, leads to a total deterioration of public life in the afflicted races. Government leaders dare
not offer a stern program to their masses of human grains of sand: they abdicate, but remain in office as
private men. Government ceases; the only functions that continue are the ones that have always gone on,
no new aim, no sacrifices. Keep the old going; no creation! No effort! That would be too hard. Keep the
pleasures going, the panem et circenses. Never mind the necessities of life, we are willing to renounce
them as long as we have the pleasures.
This weakening of the will leads to voluntary abandonment of empires conquered with the blood of
millions over ten generations. It leads to abysmal hatred of whoever and whatever represents sternness,
creation, the Future. One of its products is Pacifism, and the only way a racially-dissolving population
can be driven to war is through conscription coupled with pacifist propaganda— “This is the last war—
actually it is a war against war.” Only an intellectual could be taken in by such stark Unreality. The weak
will of society manifests itself in the Bolshevism of the upper classes, the sympathy with the enemies of
society. Anyone with unimpaired will however is really felt to be the enemy— even cogent reasoning is
hated: ideals are so much less demanding.
Mediocrity rises over the horizon of a dying race as its last great ideal; total mediocrity, renunciation of
all greatness and distinction of any kind whatever; also mediocrity of the racial blood-stream— anyone
can come in now, not only on our terms, for there are no more terms, and there are no racial differences,
everything is one, dull, eventless, mediocre.
The weakening of the will is not hard put to find an ideology which rationalizes it as “progress,”
everything desirable, the aim of all previous history. The democracy-liberalism complex lies to hand, and
it acquires in such times the meaning of Death— of race, nation and Culture. There are no human
differences, everyone is equal, men are women, women are men, “the individual” is everything, Life is a
long holiday whose main problem is devising new and more stupid pleasures, there is no God, no State,
off with the head of anyone who says there is a mission, who wishes to resurrect Authority.
These symptoms, or similar ones, will be found present at the demise of every upper stratum whose will
is weakened. Western policy has the duty of encouraging in its education of the youth its manifestations of strong
character, self-discipline, honor, ambition, renunciation of weakness, striving after perfection, superiority,
leadership— in a word— Race.
The man of race disciplines himself— because he needs discipline. Strong instincts need a strong will.
Race is also a residue of inner chaos, for only out of chaos can come creation, whether of thought or deed.
Strong instincts are the prerequisite of every outstanding performance even the creation of a work for the
intellect. The raceless, rootless-intellectual attitude has no inner imperative— it shrugs its shoulders and
says “So what?” Such an attitude is that of finished men— they are used up before they start. They can
insist on nothing, compel nothing, perform nothing. A hundred men of race without particular intellectual
qualifications can accomplish more under the same leader than a thousand intellectuals from the
pavements of the great cities. A man of race is not yet finished— he offers material for performance.
An intellectual cannot be inspired— enthusiasm he regards, quite seriously, as pathological, as mania.
He prefers to sit in his cocktail lounge or his sidewalk cafe, sipping his alcohol and preserving the degagé
manner. The talk is of pathetic ideals of social and sexual atomism, of “new artistic tendencies,” of “the
subconscious,” of “democracy”— but over it all is the perfume of decay. It is a world of boredom, a blase
degeneration, the casual bumpings and connections of grains of sand— in one word, the sarcophagus of
the race. Baudelaire, with his preoccupation with corpses, is its perfect expression: the world of the
intellectual is the putrescence of the superpersonal soul. Where this sort of material has influence, the
barbarian has easy conquests.
Western policy must recognize these facts. Education policy, propaganda, public life, must form the
race away from this charnel outlook. To keep away from all these forms of decadence is to safeguard the
strength of the race. To allow them is to promote the death of the race.
trendkill>


anarchy is a tool of the globalist
25.06.2006 - 23:44
You still do not understand what your supposed beliefs in anarchy foster do you Frank? The weakening of an independent state is the ultimate goal of all globalists as they work towards the serfdom of the masses through indoctrination of "global thinking". They strive to strip away all ideas of race and culture and nation and state to get the masses to conform to one big global identity that they will rule. They want people like you to work for them by propagating anarchy and the dissolving of identity of all into one. By stripping away identity you corode the inner core of society; like ot or not, this once great nation was built by white europeans. Slavery was an istitution that existed long before slaves were brought here and still continues today in many countries like Israel. You surely won't mind that since it is white gentile women that are enslaved. Don't believe me? Read the papers of the world including Israels own media.

Now, onto the question of Timbuktu and the schools of higher learning. No, I did not misread the source I quoted as it clearly states that this age of learning was brought on during the reign of the Songhay empire which was not negroid but Arab. Any more questions? Please name a great learning institution in BLACK Africa.

Now, as far as great African cultures you cited, let's look at Axum..Oops, you just mentioned an Arab culture: The Aksumites were a people formed from the mix of Kushitic speaking people in Ethiopia and Semitic speaking people in southern Arabia who settled the territory across the Red Sea around 500 BC. The Aksumites lived in the Ethiopian highlands near the Red Sea, and so enjoyed a strategic position in the trade routes between Yemen (in the south of the Arabian peninsula) and the cities of Nubia. They spoke a strongly Semitic language and wrote in Semitic characters; Ethiopia, in fact, has one of the longest continuous literate traditions in Africa.

We know very little about the early Axumite kingdom. Roman and Greek sources indicate that an Axumite kingdom was thriving in the first century AD; the city of Adulis is frequently mentioned because it had become one of the most important port cities in Africa.

Aksum lay dead in the path of the growing commercial trade routes between Africa, Arabia, and India. As a result, it became fabulously wealthy and its major cities, Adulis, Aksum, and Matara, became three of the most important cosmopolitan centers in the ancient world. Although they were off the beaten path as far as European history is concerned, they were just as cosmopolitan and culturally important in that they served as a crossroads to a variety of cultures: Egyptian, Sudanic, Arabic, Middle Eastern, and Indian. Perhaps an indication of this cosmopolitan character can be found in the fact that the major Aksumite cities had Jewish, Nubian, Christian, and even Buddhist minorities.

Oh, black minority population.

Ok, Nubia: Nubia was also called - Upper & Lower Nubia, Kush, Land of Kush, Te-Nehesy, Nubadae, Napata, or the Kingdom of Meroei.

The region referred to as Lower Egypt is the northernmost portion. Upper Nubia extends south into Sudan and can be subdivided into several separate areas such as Batn El Hajar or "Belly of Rocks", the sands of the Abri-Delgo Reach, or the flat plains of the Dongola Reach. Nubia, the hottest and most arid region of the world, has caused many civilizations to be totally dependent on the Nile for existence.

So it was connected to Egypt and not part of black Africa. Next!

Wagadugu: Hmmmm...not much out there yet the claim by blacks is that the society that was named as such was advanced as any european one of the time. They do mention that there is no written record of it since Africans tell stories orally an not in written form so we have very little evidence of any advanced culture that rivaled the Greeks and Romans. Also, it apparantely was in northern Africa, much further than present day Ghana. Gee, if only they had written down anything at all that we could see like those peky European societies.

Nok: The Nok Culture spanned the end of the Neolithic (Stone Age) and start of the Iron Age in sub-Saharan Africa.

Archaeological evidence at the two sites suggest that these were permanent settlements, and centres for farming and manufacturing - this is the oldest evidence for an organised society in sub-Saharan Africa.

Iron working, smelting and fabrication of iron tools became widespread in the region form around 350 BCE. Archaeologists disagree whether this was an independent development (methods of smelting may have derived form the use of kilns for firing terracotta) or whether the skill was brought south form the North African coast by traders (records suggest that Phoenician traders were crossing (what is now) the Sahara at that time.

Hmm, again, not very much evidence of a roman/greek type society in sub-saharan Africa. Next!

Kamem-Bornu: The Kanuri grew powerful enough to unite the kingdom of Bornu with Kanem during the reign of Idris Alawma (1575-1610). Idris Alawma was a fervent Muslim and set about building a Muslim state all the way west into Hausaland in northern Nigeria. This state would last for another two hundred years, but in 1846, it finally succumbed to the growing power of the Hausa states. Next!

Benin: The powerful ancient Benin kingdom was founded by the son of an Ife king in the early 14th century AD. It was situated in the forest area of southern Nigeria, 106 miles southeast of Ife. The art of bronze casting was introduced around the year 1280. The kingdom reached its maximum size and artistic splendor in the 15th and 16th century. For a long time the Benin bronze sculptures were the only historical evidence dating back several centuries into the West African past, and both the level of technical accomplishment attained in bronze casting, as well as the monumental vigor of the figures represented, were the object of great admiration. Benin bronzes are better known than the artworks from Ife or Owo due to their presence in Western museums since 1890s. In the thirteenth century, the city of Benin was an agglomeration of farms enclosed by walls and a ditch. Each clan was subject to the oba (king). The “Benin style” is a court art from the palace of the oba, and has nothing in common with tribal art. The Benin oba employed a guild of artisans who all lived in the same district of the city. Bronze figures ordered by the king were kept in the palace. The empire flourished until 1897, when the palace was sacked by the English in reprisal for an ambush that had cost the British vice-consul his life.


So, tribal castings is the high culture of Africa? Next?

Great Zimbabwe: Despite decades of study, mysteries still cling to Great Zimbabwe like ivy. How did its residents manage to monopolize trade in the area? To what degree was it a religious center? Why was it abandoned? Even the question that, as Garlake said about the site itself, "has given rise to such strong, widespread, and often bizarre emotional responses"—who built it?—has been only partly answered. One giant stone structure that has no equavalent in all of sub-saharan Africa. Interesteing to say the least yet many questions are still unanswered.

The point is, there were no advanced societies in black Africa as those in Europe. Plain and simple, different people and different cultures. Period. And most certainly, African black culture has a direct effect on American black culture. Yes, who blacks are is partly made of genetics. Blacks are different from whites genetically.

If blacks are suppresed by whites, why are there so many black success stories? Why are there so many blacks that are gainfully employed and are educated when most of them accept stereotypical lives? Because something inside them drove them to not accept what the black culture vomits. Sucking it up and working hard is another way of looking at the blacks who make something of themselves. I work with many blacks and know many black men that make a great living and are good at their job. The funny thing is, that any black man can get a job, especially in my line of work. Minority hiring is all the rage with PC employers who want to make the ADL happy by hiring as many non-whites as possible whether they are qualifies or not. Maybe it is just your age and lack of experience that blinds you to many truths about race in America.

trendkill>


Different societies
27.06.2006 - 07:56
The level of socieites "advancement" has long been shown to be linked to factors other than genetics. Please get into the 21st century, thanks.
Arditi del Popolo>


racism is a tool of the upper classes
27.06.2006 - 15:06
my "supposed" beliefs? come on now, i never questioned your beliefs in genocide, why would you question mine in what i say i fight for?

as for anarchism being a tool of the globalist are you that blind? maybe that's true if we are talking about making a cooperational world were none are oppressed, but if we are speaking of a global system of capitalism then why huge crackdown on effective anarchist organizing? why the massive security at globalization meetings? why was the IWW crushed and not the racist AFL?

aside from culture the global capitalist does not want to strip away any of the things you listed. he likes the idea of race because it keeps the poor seperated into waring factions. he certainly likes nations and states because he can keep poor people from accessing resources of the wealthy by segregating them into poor countries.

this nation was built by slavery and has been oppressive since it's inception by puritianical fascists. i never said that slavery was a creation of this country, i know my history. moreover i never said that slavery had ended. even more over hoow dare you speak about the slavery of women when the group that you are here to defend's (white revolution) own forum describes women's issues as "recipe swapping and child bareing." barefoot and pregnant much?

now onto your points... these kingdoms were muslim controlled, not arab controlled. muslims come in all colors. next...

by your own admission the nok culture was advanced. and you say that i make all your poitns for you. ha.

i never set out to prove a roman greek type society. i set out to prove an advanced society which i did. you lose. yes there were different cultures and different people. i would never try to prove otherwise. what i diid prove is that these people are not genetically inferior as you would have everyone believe.

yes black are OPPressed (not SUPressed). you yourself prove that racism still exists in this country. and the reason that there are black success stories now (just as there were in the obviously oppressive jim crow era) is because human beings can find ways to survive and get ahead in almost any situation. this is true no matter what color they are.

yet again you go back to culture. you are persistant i'll give you that. but it doesn't prove at all your inferiority point, so stop coming back to it. or at the very least address how you can talk aabout culture and use it to prove the racism you promote that says that blacks are inferior. personally i don't believe anyone to be inferior based on race and your points have done nothing to make me or anyone else feel this is true.

lastly, you do not know how old i am or what my experience is. please do not assume anything about me ever again.
frank nowarcyck>


great african culture
27.06.2006 - 23:15
Jack Grimston, Sunday Times (UK), June 25, 2006


An official inquiry into the abuse of African children branded as witches is expected to conclude that there have been at least 50 such cases over five years in London alone.

The investigation is expected to find that cases of sorcery-related abuse are now spreading outside the capital to areas such as Liverpool, Newcastle and parts of Yorkshire—although they remain confined to only a minority of Africans in Britain.

The abuse of the children has ranged from shouting to beating, starving, slashing with knives and razors and, in at least one case, murder.

Lord Adonis, the education minister, announced in the House of Lords last week that the report, which he said addressed “very grave” issues, was likely to be published by next month.

The education department maintains that publication of the findings, which were delivered to Whitehall in January, has been delayed because they are being “studied by ministers”.

Critics insist the real reason is that the government is fearful of upsetting race relations. “They have found this quite hot to handle,” said Richard Hoskins, visiting research fellow in the sociology of religion at King’s College London and an expert witness in several court cases involving witchcraft claims.

“I think it is almost as crude as white, liberal, middle-class people thinking they can’t be seen to be telling black people what they are doing wrong. It is ridiculous when you are dealing with children’s rights.”

Debbie Ariyo, founder of the lobby group Africans Unite Against Child Abuse, said that while many abuse reports had been exaggerated, “we can’t shy away from the problems”.

Among the cases expected to be covered by the report are:

Adam, the name given to a boy whose torso was found in the Thames in 2001. The killers of the child, who is believed to have come from Nigeria and to have been a victim of ritual sacrifice, have not been found.

Girl B, a case which came to court last June in which three people were given sentences ranging from four to 10 years for torturing a girl of eight from Angola who they believed was a witch. Part of the “exorcism” involved rubbing chilli peppers into her eyes, a practice Hoskins described as a “repeat pattern in many cases”.

Cases in which British-born children have been sent to live in Congo and ended up in revivalist churches where they were subjected to brutal exorcisms.

Practices such as the exorcism of evil spirits from the “possessed” were first noted in Britain shortly after large numbers of African immigrants began arriving in the 1990s.

People from several countries have been implicated, but many allegations centre on evangelical churches in the Congolese community.

About 20,000 immigrants from the Democratic Republic of Congo live in Britain, mainly refugees from the country’s devastating civil war, which has cost an estimated 4m lives since the 1990s.

Activists who have investigated witchcraft in Congo argue that before the 1990s, such abuse of children hardly existed. However, with an increase in the number of child soldiers and prostitutes and orphans wandering the streets of Congolese cities, children have come to be blamed for many of society’s ills by a people with a long tradition of believing in the supernatural.

An investigation last year by Save the Children, the international charity, noted: “Witchcraft and violence against children seems to have been established as a pattern within urban Congolese society. The revivalist churches play a role in amplifying conflicts within the family. They offer no explanation other than child witchcraft.”

Eleanor Stobart, the consultant who wrote the report, was given access to Metropolitan police case files and held discussions with teachers, social workers and religious leaders over three months.

She is understood to conclude that while there is little firm evidence that witchcraft—related abuse is widespread, it may be under-reported.

She is expected to call for greater efforts to integrate immigrants who, in many cases, speak little English and have limited contact with mainstream society.





trendkill>


culture is everything
28.06.2006 - 00:29
Those which surround us and think like us and have the same values as us are producers of culture. Culture stems from the beliefs and habits of any "society". In the end, it is not people who make the culture, but the culture which defines the people. Black culture unfortunately defines the majority of black Americans and binds them into servitude not to the white man but thier own kind. The reason the majority of black children are born into the world with no father is not because of the white man. The reason is because of the black culture which is propogated by the tools of the culture like rap music. Blacks have higher AIDS rates, higher crime rates, lower IQ scores, the list go on and on and on....That does not mean that on any given day a black man can show himslef that is smarter than any white man. It does mean that the numbers of those black men will be minute.
The National Assessment of Educational Progress, “the nation’s report card”, shows that only 25% of black 17 year olds read as well as the average white 17 year old. Nearly 90% of black 17 year olds score below the average white 17 year old in math. More than 90% of black 17 year olds score below the average white 17 year old in science. In the end, the average black high school graduate has the academic proficiency of the average white 8th grader. Again, poverty does not cover the fact that a larger percentage of the black population is far behind other races in just about every facet of intelligence. There are many poor whites and Asians in this country and the percentages of poor crime offenders are far less than those that are poor and black.

AIDS seems to have the reverse image of what you say about poverty in Africa:

John Donnelly, Boston Globe, June 14, 2006


DURBAN, South Africa—The richest people in Africa have higher HIV prevalence rates than the poorest, disputing commonly held beliefs that AIDS is a disease driven by poverty, according to an analysis released yesterday of recent data from eight African countries.

The study, which was presented and debated in South Africa at the third annual US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief meeting, found that the poorest 20 percent of the population almost always had a lower HIV prevalence rate than the richest 20 percent. The study’s author said the findings should be used to make sure AIDS prevention messages are reaching those who earn the most money.

“Poverty-driven programs are likely to have limited impact on prevention efforts when the majority of HIV-infected people are the wealthiest, not the poorest,” said Vinod Mishra , director of research at ORC Macro , a Maryland-based research company that conducts detailed demographic surveys around the world.

Mishra gave several possible reasons why those with more money have higher HIV prevalence rates. One is that studies show that the richest people have more partners, “more opportunities to travel, more opportunities for casual sex,” and rich men can afford to buy sex, Mishra said in an interview. He also said wealthier men in Africa start having sex at an earlier age than poorer men, though wealthier women start to have sex later than poorer women.

Maybe culture does have something to do with it:

Entirely apart from the issue of truthfulness, the behavior and perhaps even the biology of non-whites may contribute to their relatively high rates of AIDS. For example, if they are in jail, men who are ordinarily heterosexual may have anal intercourse (voluntarily or involuntarily). Since blacks are six to ten times more likely than whites to be in jail, and since unprotected anal intercourse is one of the most common ways to get AIDS, this contributes to high rates among blacks. It has also been found that black bisexuals have, on average, twice as many female partners as white bisexuals, and are 50 percent more likely to engage in anal intercourse with them.

Here is the fine black culture after the disaster:

CNN, June 14, 2006


WASHINGTON (CNN)—A $200 bottle of champagne from Hooters and $300 worth of “Girls Gone Wild” videos were among items bought with debit cards handed out by FEMA to help hurricane victims, auditors probing $1 billion in potential waste and fraud have found.

The cards—given to people displaced by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita—also bought diamond jewelry and a vacation in the Dominican Republic, according to the Government Accountability Office audit.

The GAO uncovered records showing that $1,000 from a FEMA debit card went to a Houston divorce lawyer; $600 was spent in a strip club and $400 was spent on “adult erotica products,” all of which auditors concluded were “not necessary to satisfy legitimate disaster needs.”

The GAO found that at least $1 billion in disaster relief payments by the Federal Emergency Management Agency were improper and potentially fraudulent because the recipients provided incomplete or incorrect information when they registered for assistance. (GAO report)

The GAO said the scope of the problem may be even larger, because it only looked at the validity of registration information and not at other forms of potential fraud.

More great black child rearing culure:

I would like to bring to your readership’s attention to a new low in merchandising, a brand of baby and children’s clothes called “Pimpfants.”

On the “Pimpfants” web site, you are offered a broad spectrum of the ghetto-style outfits favored by black gangsters.

This is only one of many examples of American businesses using gangster culture to sell products. Lee Iacocca, for example, appeared in a commercial with rapper Snoop Dogg to sell cars.

If the MTV pimps of Compton, Harlem, Detroit, Baltimore, etc., were not bankrolled and promoted by the pimps of Madison Avenue, they would have far less influence in this culture than they do.

Merchandisers have the right to sell gangster-style clothes and promote the gangster lifestyle. What saddens me is the fact that we are buying it. Soon you will be able to deck your little Thugling out in Baby Beaters Bloods Bling chic and take him down to celebrate International Pimp Day. He might grow up to run a string of high-class “Hos,” or better yet, become an Ad Man.

“Pimp” still means pimp.

Black music culture:

An article on female rapper Da Brat begins by quoting her on the set of a video shoot saying, "Can somebody get some tissues and wipe around my titties?" She also shows a sophisticated understanding of promotion: "The album cover [of my next release] is going to be tight, wet and squeezing . . . .Hopefully niggas will say, 'damn, I wanna f**k her,' so I can get the record sales goin'."

A review of an album by a group called Hypnotize Camp quotes the lyrics: "I conversates/I'm tryin' to f**k on the first date . . . ." Other songs on the album include "Project Hoes" and "D**k Suckin' Hoes." Many of the photos and advertisements show provocatively dressed women in suggestive poses and men with their shirts off. Advertisements in the back of the magazine tout phone sex and 1-900 numbers with names like "I like it Raw!" "Phat Phone Phun" and "Love Shack." Others offer videos of exotic dancers and "uncensored" tapes of black celebrations like "Freaknik."

Half the pages in The Source are ads and most of them are for clothing or accessories. From the look of the rappers and the advertisements, hip-hop is serious about clothing and jewelry. For men, the advertisers tout baggy designer jeans, basketball shoes, leather boots and sneakers, baggy athletic shorts, Italian shoes and something called "urban style." Many of the rappers and men in advertisements wear gold chains, bracelets and rings. The hot look for male rappers is to go bear-chested with their pants hanging low enough to show their underwear. Many have tattoos and wear kerchiefs on their heads. Almost all strike angry, glaring poses in front of the camera. There are very few articles about women; The Source is clearly aimed at black men.


Black culture loves learning:

Kathleen Lucadamo, New York Daily News, March 6, 2006


Teach for America, known as the Peace Corps for struggling urban schools, has sent its teachers to the worst crime-ridden schools in the nation.

But one Harlem school is too dangerous—even for them.

The national group pulled about 10 of its teachers from Intermediate School 172 after one of them was threatened and others were assaulted last year, the Daily News has learned.

And Teach for America is refusing to send any corps members back to IS 172 until order is restored, sources said.

It is believed to be the first time the organization has blacklisted a school anywhere in the nation in its 16-year history.

{snip}

Since Teach for America abandoned IS 172, the school has only gotten worse, several teachers told The News.

English teacher George Ticoras said he had a chair hurled at him by a student and has been assaulted several times by kids.

“I’m not shocked that I am at a school that is violent and where kids are underperforming,” he said. “I’m shocked that the Education Department has no plan to improve things.”

Teachers said students routinely roam the halls of the W. 129th St. building, pushing their way into classrooms where they don’t belong and pulling fire alarms.

“I have told teachers to lock their doors for their personal safety,” said Sandy Haiman, who is paid to mentor five rookie teachers at the school.

Haiman, a retired teacher who worked 27 years in city schools, said she has never witnessed a school as out of control as IS 172.

“I have to wear earplugs—that’s how bad the noise level is,” she said.

{snip}

It is plagued by four times the number of major crime incidents tallied at the average city middle school, and a stunning 90% of its students fail to meet math and reading standards.

Black culture on money:

Digital Digest (Detroit), Feb. 8, 2006


These are tough economic times, especially for African-Americans, for whom the unemployment rate is more than 10%. Alarmingly, rather than belt-tightening, the response has been to spend more. In many poor neighborhoods, one is likely to notice satellite dishes and expensive new cars.

According to Target Market, a company that tracks black consumer spending, blacks spend a significant amount of their income on depreciable products.

In 2002, the year the economy nose-dived; we spent $22.9 billion on clothes, $3.2 billion on electronics and $11.6 billion on furniture to put into homes that, in many cases, were rented.

Among our favorite purchases are cars and liquor. Blacks make up only 12% of the U.S. population, yet account for 30% of the country’s Scotch consumption. Detroit, which is 80% black, is the world’s No. 1 market for Cognac.

So impressed was Lincoln with the $46.7 billion that blacks spent on cars that the automaker commissioned Sean “P Diddy” Combs, the entertainment and fashion mogul, to design a limited-edition Navigator replete with six plasma screens, three DVD players and a Sony PlayStation 2.

The only area where blacks seem to be cutting back on spending is books; total purchases have gone from a high of $356 million in 2000 to $303 million in 2002. This shortsighted behavior, motivated by a desire for instant gratification and social acceptance, comes at the expense of our future. The National Urban League’s “State of Black America 2004” report found that fewer than 50% of black families owned their homes compared with more than 70% of whites.

According to published reports, the Ariel Mutual Funds/Charles Schwab 2003 Black Investor Survey found that when comparing households where blacks and whites had roughly the same household incomes, whites saved nearly 20% more each month for retirement, and 30% of African-Americans earning $100,000 a year had less than $5,000 in retirement savings. While 79% of whites invest in the stock market, only 61% of African-Americans do.

Those are all mainstreem articles from sources around the nation and world. They make a clear picture of the black culture and all of it's shortcomimngs. The blacks in this nation should rise against the suicide machine that is "blackness" in America. Reading does not take money, abstinence does not take money, integrity does not take money, honesty does not take money, being a role model does not take money. Stop making excuses for Americas blacks because they wont do it for themselves unless the handouts stop! Check out Tony Browns Journal, I told you there are a few good black leaders out there.

By the way, the globalist cartel does not care about race, we are all the same in there eyes; serfs. Again, you obviously do not study anything outside your hardline beliefs or you would know that Bush s trying to create a North American state much like Europe is becoming with a common currency. I stated that last time but you just glossed right over that fact. Why do you think Bush and his cronies despise leaders who are starting to proclaim independence from the IMF and have reclaimed there own national wealth from the globalists. South America has a number of countries that are leaving the globalist community behind. If this country had real men interested in it's well being we would be isolationists like the framers of the constitution desired. Once the barriers are broken down, a one world government is in place, a global taxation, and the few at the top gain total control. They can not do that with dissenters who refuse to let an independent America die. Did you know that NAFTA has a clause that strictly forbids America from militarising the border? Why do you think the Bush cartel balrely protects this country? The best thing you can do for yourself is check out infowars.com, fromthewilderness.com, and a few other sites that offer news from around the globe that you won't find on CVV and Fox. By the way, whiterevolution.com is one of hundreds of sites that I check out and has soley to do with looking at as many sources for news and information form all perspectives and angles.


trendkill>


ok, lets try this.
29.06.2006 - 12:21
ok, through this discussion i have raised many points that you have failed to address. so how about this time i will attempt to address all your points and then at the end i will have a list of point i would like you too address head on. if i fail to touch on anything that you would like me to respond to you can do the same at the end of your next post.

first as to the article that you posted from the uk times:
this proves nothing aside from the fact that some people are sick. tghis cannot be argued against and you will never find me attempting to justify child abuse or murder. if i were to site articles about white seriel killers (ed gein, ted bundy, etc.) would it prove that all white people are horrible human beings?

on to your next post:

of course culture has something to do with it! i never argued against that statement. what i argued against is saying that an entire race of people is inferior based on genetics which is what you white supremacists say.

of course blacks score lower on tests. most black schools are underfunded, teach a white curriculum and are in poor neighborhoods where parents do not have the time to aid their children as much.

your article on AIDs proves nothing and almost doesn't warrant responce. all it says is that the more well off of the poorest continent on earth have AIDs too. what were you attempting to prove by this? and yes again culture does have to do wiith AIDs in the united states. many blacks are not educated the same way as whites when it comes to safe sex. yes blacks are imprisoned more due to many factors that are all tied up with a very racist police force that acts as an occupying army of poor communities. this is the culture we live in.

on hurricane relief. is it any surprise that when impoverished people get free money they spend it? our culture tells people that they should aspire to live richly, and this is not just "black culture". you will get no arguement from me that this is not a good thing to aspire too.

on pimpfants:

first off, quoteing an article from american renaissance? come on! if you are attempting to prove points (which should be logical) then do not cite a reference to a known racist site. this is debate 101. you are allowed to be biased during debate, your references are not.

your own (racist) reference makes my point for me however.
"If the MTV pimps of Compton, Harlem, Detroit, Baltimore, etc., were not bankrolled and promoted by the pimps of Madison Avenue, they would have far less influence in this culture than they do."
what does this mean? it means that this culture is being promoted by those (white folks) in power. it is in these people's interest to promote an unquestioning commitment to materialism and the status quo.

music culture:
yes, the mainstream promotes some sick stuff. by the same token i can quote a good number of hip hop groups with amazing messages. here are a few:
"It's time for some mind sex, we ain't got to take our clothes off yet
We can burn the incense, and just chat
Relax, I got the good vibrations
Before we make love let's have a good conversation"
-dead prez "mind sex"
"Tell that boy he's wrong
Girls are strong
Next time at show and tell play him our song"
-the coup "wear clean draws"

of course the source is full of ads! have you seen a magazine in the past 20 years? they are all full of needless stuff to buy. to illustrate this lets examine cosmopolitan the way you examined the source. half the pages are ads. check. from the look of the ads white women are are serious about clothing and jewlery. check. For women, the advertisers tout short designer skirts, high-heeled shoes, leather purses and bags, tight pants, Italian shoes and something called "high fasion." check. Many of the celebrities and women in advertisements wear gold chains, bracelets and rings. check. The hot look for male celebreties is to go bear-chested with their pants hanging low enough to show their six pack. check. many of the women loook anorexic. almost all strike airey know nothing poses. there are fer articles about men (other than how to please them). cosmo is clearly aimed at women. this culture is sick and dangerous.

onto is 172:
“I’m not shocked that I am at a school that is violent and where kids are underperforming,” he said. “I’m shocked that the Education Department has no plan to improve things.”
what? a predominantly white, affluent education system has no plan to help a poor black school? shocking.

onto money choices:
this entire generation is over spending itself. we are told to consume even if we cannot really afford to do so. in addition to this inflation has left us with less money. at the same time blacks are told that the onlly way to advance themselves is through material gains. this diverts their attention from equality.

aside from your AR article you are correct. thiese are mainstream sources that reflect a psycopathic culture of which we are all a part. all of us should rise up and cast off the death machiene that is american culture. until we do we all suffer. this does not however make your stated points that races should seperate. nor does it prove your unstated but historically proven intention of killing of those you deem as "inferior."

lastly on global capital. capital does all that it can to insure it's power. this includes keeping races seperate so that they do not team up against the common enemy (global capital). your idea of a north american currency will not happen for a long time based on the poverty in mexico and opposition to it in all three nafta countries.

now thinggs that i would like you to respond to:
1. do you believe that culture and genetics are interconnected?
2. since culture can be changed why do you believe that black are inherently inferior due to it?
3. please justify your protection of a group that holds such antiquated views on women (in reference to recipe/child bearing women's issue on WR's forum)
4. are you aware that there were many blacks in north africa (the moores for instance)
5. what would your ideal world be like? what would happen to blacks? whites? native americans?

please answer these questions and i will be more than willing to shoot down everything you have to say. (you don't make it that hard.)
frank nowarcyck> <